Rachel Reeves says the UK wants tax rises to steadiness her finances. That is merely unsuitable. Tax does not fund authorities spending: spending comes first. Elevating taxes now would drain cash from an economic system already scuffling with low demand and weak wages. The one individuals who ought to pay extra are the idle rich, who’re these hoarding unproductive wealth in property and shares. Everybody else wants the federal government to spend, make investments, and rebuild the economic system. Reeves’ plan will do the alternative.

That is the transcript:

There is a large lie being informed by Rachel Reeves, which is that we’re going to want tax rises to steadiness her finances.

We do not want tax will increase as a result of they take cash out of our economic system. And proper now the UK wants extra money being spent into our economic system and never much less.

And there is just one exception to that common rule that I’ve simply made,  which is that the idle rich hoarding money and property that do nothing for development, do have to pay extra tax in order that their wealth may be redistributed to those that will spend it. However that is it. That is the one tax improve that we want.

So let’s simply stand again for a second and take into account what the details are right here.  Politicians nonetheless fake that tax funds public spending within the UK. It does not, and so they nonetheless fake that we should steadiness the books of the federal government, and we needn’t.

The reality is that authorities spending all the time comes earlier than tax, and it has to as a result of in any other case, the place else would the cash have come from to allow tax to be paid? Simply give it some thought. If the federal government did not become profitable within the first place, how would there be money out there to pay tax?

And so no sane authorities would truly consider that tax funds authorities spending, and but ours claims to.

And no sane authorities would additionally consider it has to steadiness its books when it is aware of that it should run a deficit whether it is  to take a position and whether it is to gas development by spending extra into the economic system than it takes again by the use of tax, as a result of that is the stimulus that’s wanted to get the result that it claims it needs, which is extra revenue this 12 months than there was out there final 12 months.

Elevating taxes now would simply take away the gas that drives our economic system. And but that is what Rachel Reeves says she needs to do.

Tax rises now may solely make issues worse. The fact is that extraordinary households within the UK are already  scuffling with real-term pay cuts. Taxing them extra would kill demand, and demand  is what retains folks in jobs, and austerity pondering, which is related to tax rises at this second, would create extra self-harm, even when it is dressed up as accountability.

The exception, as I say, although, is taxing idle wealth. Idle wealth is represented by financial savings that haven’t been put to constructive use. It is cash saved in shares and shares, which have been purchased secondhand as a result of nearly no new shares are actually issued by firms and due to this fact, the  cash that’s used to purchase shares and shares today is solely cash saved out of use relatively than cash used to create new jobs and development on this economic system.

And it is also cash used to purchase secondhand properties, whether or not they be enterprise properties or properties which can be then let within the buy-to-let market, as a result of that is additionally about shopping for secondhand property and no new actual wealth is created as a consequence both.

So, that idle cash that represents most of wealth within the UK is not circulating in our economic system. It is stagnant. It is lifeless. Moribund. Select whichever phrase you want. It is  nailed to its perch in case you are sufficiently old to recollect a Monty Python sketch.

The purpose is, if we had a good, honest tax system, we might recycle that cash from the idle wealth and their financial savings again into productive use to create funding in our economic system. Funding within the issues we wish, like  housing and the defence from floods and all kinds of different issues, from inexperienced power era onwards.  And that may, in fact, then create wages and public companies, which we may get pleasure from.

So tax rises for everyone however the idle wealth of the nation do not make any sense in any respect. They simply drain cash from working folks, slowing financial development. But when we have been to tax idle wealth, we might give folks extra money to spend, and that may gas demand.

So  we should change our concepts on tax. We do not want general tax rises. We want smarter taxes. Taxes that truly guarantee we get what we actually need, which is prosperity relatively than wealth inequality.

If we did that, we may fund our future and rebuild hope. However at current, Rachel Reeves is planning on doing the precise reverse. She’s going to depart the rich untouched, and he or she’s going to hurt extraordinary folks and their prospects. And the outcome would be the precise reverse of what she says her aim is.  There can be a decline in financial exercise within the UK relatively than development, and that basically does mark her out as a failure within the making.

Taking additional motion

If you wish to write a letter to your MP on the problems raised on this weblog submit, there’s a ChatGPT immediate to help you in doing so, with full directions, right here.

One phrase of warning, although: please guarantee you’ve gotten the proper MP. ChatGPT can get it unsuitable.

Feedback 

When commenting, please be aware of this weblog’s remark coverage, which is on the market right here. Contravening this coverage will lead to feedback being deleted earlier than or after preliminary publication on the editor’s sole discretion and with out rationalization being required or provided.