What’s the distinction between over-optimization, curve becoming, historical past studying, hard-coding, and neural networks.
When merchants see a flawless fairness curve in MetaTrader 5 — no drawdowns, almost 99% profitable trades — the primary intuition is to purchase or use that EA instantly.
However such outcomes don’t at all times imply the technique really works.
They typically end result from hidden tips or flawed improvement practices that make the EA carry out solely on historic information — not in reside markets.
This text explains the variations between over-optimization, curve becoming, historical past studying, hard-coding, and neural networks, exhibiting which strategies are official and that are fraudulent.
1️⃣ Over-Optimization (Parameter Tuning)
What It Is
Over-optimization occurs when a developer tunes the EA’s parameters too exactly to previous information simply to make the backtest look good.
The EA just isn’t really “studying” — it’s merely matching the previous value patterns it has already seen.
Instance:
Th EA is optimized on 2022–2024 information. After a number of optimization cycles, the outcomes turn into “excellent.”
However when examined on 2025 or one other image — efficiency collapses.
How It Appears within the Tester
-
Clean, linear progress with no drawdowns
-
Unrealistically secure profitability
-
Fully completely different outcomes on different durations or symbols
Why It’s Not Fraud (However a Mistake)
Over-optimization is not deliberate fraud — it’s a technical error brought on by extreme parameter tuning.
Nevertheless, promoting such an EA as a “common system” is deceptive.
✅ Legit: If the writer discloses the optimization interval and validates it on new information (out-of-sample check).
❌ Not official: If the writer hides the truth that outcomes are restricted to at least one historic vary.
2️⃣ Curve Becoming (The “Match Curve EA”)
What It Is
Curve becoming is the excessive type of over-optimization — the place the EA is successfully designed to breed a particular historic curve.
As a substitute of figuring out buying and selling logic, it learns each element of the previous, dropping all predictive energy.
A curve-fitted EA doesn’t have a constant buying and selling precept — it merely memorizes the historical past.
How It Appears
-
Practically excellent backtest curve with 99% worthwhile trades
-
Dozens of adjustable parameters (filters, durations, indicators, and so on.)
-
Whole failure on new information or after minor market regime modifications
Why It’s Harmful
Curve becoming creates a statistically meaningless mannequin.
It really works solely on the information it was “match” to and instantly breaks in actual buying and selling.
✅ Partially official just for analysis, not for reside deployment.
❌ Fraudulent, if used to promote a product as “AI” or “common.”
3️⃣ Historical past Studying
What It Is
That is the most blatant and fraudulent method.
The EA’s code deliberately or by accident reads future information that will be unknown in real-time.
Instance:
if (Shut[i+1] > Open[i+1]) Purchase();
Right here the EA checks the subsequent candle ( i+1 ), which is inconceivable throughout reside buying and selling.
Within the MT5 tester, this creates “excellent” outcomes as a result of the EA actually is aware of the longer term.
How It Appears
-
100% worthwhile trades
-
At all times buys on the actual low, sells on the actual excessive
-
Full collapse in reside buying and selling
⚠️ 100% Fraud
This isn’t optimization — it’s information manipulation.
The EA cheats by accessing data from the longer term.
✅ Indicators: Unrealistic entries, one-direction buying and selling, no stops or TPs.
❌ Fully fraudulent.
4️⃣ Exhausting-Coding
What It Is
Exhausting-coding means embedding particular historic data immediately into the EA’s logic — dates, ranges, and even occasions.
As a substitute of reacting to market information, it merely follows a preprogrammed schedule.
Instance:
if (TimeCurrent() >= D’2023.01.01′ && TimeCurrent() <= D’2023.06.01′) Purchase();
This EA “is aware of” what occurred in 2023 — as a result of it was coded that manner.
How It Appears
-
Works flawlessly throughout a recognized interval
-
Immediately fails in new years or completely different symbols
-
No logical clarification for selections
⚠️ 100% Fraud
This technique is deliberately misleading, as customers can’t see these built-in historic guidelines.
The EA doesn’t analyze — it reenacts the previous.
❌ Fully illegitimate method.
5️⃣ Neural Networks (Machine Studying / AI)
What It Is
An EA powered by a neural community makes use of machine studying to seek out complicated, non-linear relationships in value information, volatility, and technical options.
The mannequin is skilled on one a part of the information (in-sample) and validated on unseen information (out-of-sample).
How It Appears
-
Practical efficiency with ups and downs
-
Logical adaptation to volatility and construction modifications
-
Various however explainable conduct
⚙️ When It’s Legit
A neural-based EA is 100% official when:
-
The coaching and check information are separated
-
The mannequin is mounted earlier than testing (no hidden curve becoming)
-
Ahead testing is carried out to verify generalization
✅ Legit when transparently skilled and validated.
❌ Fraudulent when the “AI” declare is pretend or used as a advertising label for curve becoming.
🧩 Abstract Comparability
| Method | Description | Legitimacy | Frequent Downside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over-Optimization | Extreme parameter tuning on historic information | ⚠️ Conditionally official if examined correctly | Loses generalization |
| Curve Becoming | EA designed to breed previous fairness curve | ❌ Largely fraudulent in buying and selling use | Memorizes historical past, zero prediction |
| Historical past Studying | EA accesses future information in tester | ❌ 100% Fraud | Unimaginable in real-time |
| Exhausting-Coding | Fastened guidelines tied to particular dates or occasions | ❌ 100% Fraud | Pure information reenactment |
| Neural Networks | Mannequin learns actual market dependencies | ✅ Legit | Threat of overfitting if poorly skilled |
💬 Closing Ideas
-
Over-Optimization is a typical mistake — not a criminal offense — if the writer is clear and validates outcomes outdoors the coaching interval.
-
Curve Becoming crosses the road — the EA doesn’t commerce, it memorizes.
-
Historical past Studying and Exhausting-Coding are outright frauds that pretend outcomes.
-
Neural Networks are official, fashionable instruments — however require self-discipline and validation to keep away from overfitting.
