Ethereum-based noncustodial lending protocol Euler Finance is making an attempt to chop a take care of the exploiter that stole hundreds of thousands from its protocol, demanding the hacker returns 90% of the funds they stole inside 24 hours or face authorized penalties.

Euler Labs despatched its ultimatum to the flash loan attacker who exploited the platform for $196 million by transferring the hacker 0 Ether (ETH) with an hooked up message on March 14:

“Following up on our message from yesterday. If 90% of the funds aren’t returned inside 24 hours, tomorrow we are going to launch a $1M reward for info that results in your arrest and the return of all funds.”

The specter of regulation enforcement comes as Euler sent the hacker a way more civil message the day earlier than.

“We perceive you’re chargeable for this morning’s assault on the Euler platform,” it learn. “We’re writing to see whether or not you’ll be open to talking with us about any potential subsequent steps.”

The request for a 90% fund return would see the hacker ship again $176.4 million whereas holding onto the remaining $19.6 million.

Nonetheless, many observers have famous that the hacker has little or no to no incentive to comply with by means of with the deal.

“If I used to be the hacker I’d merely say ‘to anybody who manages to trace me down, I provides you with $2 million to not inform Euler,’” one observer said.

“Yeh he has 200 Million they’ve 2 Million. He wins in a bidding conflict,” one other Twitter consumer wrote in response.

Euler Labs mentioned it was already working with regulation enforcement in the USA and the UK, together with partaking blockchain intelligence platforms Chainalysis, TRM Labs and the broader Ethereum group, to assist monitor down the hacker.

Associated: DeFi protocol Platypus suffers $8.5M flash loan attack, suspect identified

The lending platform added it was capable of promptly stop the flash loan attack by blocking deposits and the “weak” donation operate.

As for the exploited code, the group defined that the vulnerability “was not found” within the audit of its sensible contract, which had existed on-chain for eight months till bei exploited on March 13.