The staking providers provided by cryptocurrency trade Coinbase are “essentially totally different” to what was provided by its peer trade Kraken — which lately got here below fireplace from the US securities regulator — in keeping with Coinbase’s head lawyer.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief authorized officer, made the feedback Feb. 21 in his response to a shareholder query relating to its staking providers throughout a Q&A session on the trade’s fourth-quarter outcomes, noting:

“The staking merchandise that we provide on Coinbase are essentially totally different from the yield merchandise that had been described within the reinforcement motion in opposition to Kraken. The variations matter.”

The primary level of distinction Grewal highlighted was that Coinbase customers retain possession of their cryptocurrencies always.

In its consumer settlement, final up to date Dec. 15, Coinbase states that it merely “facilitate[s] the staking of these property in your behalf” however might not exchange any Ether (ETH) misplaced to slashing, referring to the blockchain’s mechanism for punishing unhealthy habits by decreasing a validator’s tokens.

Grewal additionally prompt that one other distinction was its clients have a “proper to the return,” with the agency unable to “merely simply determine to not pay any returns in any respect.”

He pointed to the trade’s registration as a publicly-traded firm as one other important level of distinction, which allows clients to have “deep clear perception into our financials.”

Compared, the Securities and Change Fee’s complaint against Kraken alleged its customers misplaced management of their tokens by providing them to Kraken’s staking program, and traders had been provided “outsized returns untethered to any financial realities” with Kraken additionally in a position to pay “no returns in any respect.”

Grewal nonetheless reiterated requires regulatory clarity on staking services within the U.S. suggesting the SEC was outlining their expectations in courtroom complaints fairly than via clear rules, noting:

“Guidelines making clear these distinctions would supply very actual readability and we predict the general public shouldn’t must parse complaints in federal courtroom with a view to perceive what a regulator expects.”

Associated: Coinbase beats Q4 earnings estimates amid falling transaction volume

In a Feb. 13 tweet, Grewal had opined that staking in itself was not a safety transaction, utilizing an analogy of harvesting oranges to elaborate on his place.

On the again of SEC Chair Gary Gensler calling on companies to register merchandise with the regulator, Grewal indicated that Coinbase has no points registering merchandise with the SEC the place “acceptable,” however added:

“I feel it’s truthful to say that at this time limit, the trail to registration for services that will qualify as securities has not been open, or at the least readily or simply open.”

Coinbase is at present going through an SEC investigation into its merchandise much like the one which resulted in Kraken settling with the regulator for $30 million and being prohibited from providing staking providers to its U.S. shoppers.

Coinbase intends to place up a struggle, nonetheless, with CEO and co-founder Brian Armstrong suggesting the corporate can be prepared to problem the regulator and take the matter to court.