We presume writing and compiling software program applications is simple. Nevertheless it’s not.

Once I ran my first code, a number of crimson strains, syntactical errors, and inaccurate output appeared in my console window.

My first expertise in software improvement pushed me to be taught the significance of automation testing. As a former developer, I perceive the significance of check automation in evaluating the influence of software program code earlier than it’s deployed to a stay challenge. 

Through the years, I’ve interacted with a number of software program testers and discovered in regards to the potential challenges, comparable to platform incompatibility, time constraints, a scarcity of testing experience, and bug copy, that may negatively influence the end-user expertise.  

These challenges led me to guage and analyze over 40 automation testing instruments that debug, check, and assess the influence of software program output earlier than it’s deployed into manufacturing. Out of those instruments, I narrowed my listing to the highest 7 greatest automation testing instruments that may cut back builders’ stress and nervousness, finally resulting in elevated manufacturing effectivity. 

Along with my very own evaluation, these instruments are ranked as high leaders in G2 based mostly on their core options, comparable to end-to-end UI and UX automation, pre-scripting instruments, and cross-platform testing. These options have helped them acquire a great popularity amongst software program builders and grow to be high selections out there.

5 greatest automation testing instruments that I strongly advocate

Had I used automation testing again in my programming days, I would not be neck deep in creating misguided code and re-declaring software program features to restore the output. Because it wasn’t doable to maintain a watch over each line of the programming logic, I now perceive how automation testing is essential in simplifying these tedious duties.

Merely put, an automation testing program assessments the performance of all software program code with pre-scripting providers earlier than they’re pushed to the stay manufacturing stack. Catching points early issues, as fixing vulnerabilities in manufacturing can value ~30x greater than fixing them throughout improvement.

It’s a key step in growing correct purposes because it creates varied check eventualities and provides check suggestions on the finish of every check. With automation testing instruments, I succeeded in operating a number of iterative check loops to hurry up the debugging course of and enhance code usability. 

Along with console applications, I might run check automation for varied platforms and {hardware} gadgets and automate the CI/CD workflow to construct a sturdy software. Different assessments included API testing, load testing, browser testing, and acceptance testing, which consider whether or not the code will work in an atmosphere.

As soon as I set a check design and sort, I sat again and began the automation. From nitpicking runtime errors to conducting a real-life check simulation, it streamlined the standard assurance course of with minimal guide intervention.

My tackle primary options for automation testing software program

Whereas I evaluated automation for debugging, builders have a complete set of tasks. Not solely are they required to debug written code, however additionally they management varied purposes for front-end and back-end synchronization. Whereas some check automation providers eased my worries, I experimented with extra technical and developer-focused options that may enhance enterprise effectivity.

Having these primary functionalities for testing might be useful if you’re trying to spend money on a check automation system for the long term. No software program from this listing would enhance your workload or create a problematic state of affairs of fallacious check output in your groups.

I’ve a good suggestion of which potential providers will profit your IT and dev groups.

• Help for parallel check execution: Instruments that automate a number of check circumstances proved environment friendly in decreasing builders’ time to manufacturing. For 2 applications I wrote and executed with totally different programming languages, it was straightforward to execute them concurrently and enhance high quality outcomes.
• Sturdy integration with CI/CD pipelines: I sought seamless integration with Jenkins, GitLab CI, or Azure DevOps. This allowed me to set off assessments mechanically on each code commit, guaranteeing high quality at each step of the event cycle. As builders constantly operationalize manufacturing by manually integrating prototypes with actual manufacturing environments, automation testing software program ought to automate the testing integration and CI/CD course of to make sure a easy move of the software program improvement lifecycle.
• Take a look at selection and check suggestions:  As organizations have varied system consoles and net improvement processes, I looked for software program that gives numerous check sorts and check varieties to debug and compile notebooks in several languages. In the course of the automation course of, it is usually essential for the tester (on this case, me) to guage whether or not the check adopted all the suitable steps. Recording and replaying check steps, together with getting check suggestions, is essential to enhancing iterative outcomes and fine-tuning the code.
• Complete reporting and analytics: Having personalized reviews that included check tensions, check rounds, check design sort, and bug manufacturing in actionable metrics was helpful, as I might establish and repair particular strains of code after referring to that knowledge. This helped me rapidly establish check failures and tendencies to deal with new exceptions and write higher assessments throughout totally different platforms. 
• Cross-platform and cross-browser compatibility: It was additionally crucial for me that the code bear browser testing, load testing, and API testing earlier than being revealed within the runtime atmosphere. Having cross-platform and cross-browser compatibility ensures that your supply code integrates seamlessly along with your net stack or system stack, and that your UI code is suitable with the net browser atmosphere, permitting to launch new options or updates with out rerunning assessments. 
• Superior scripting and check upkeep capabilities: Constructing scripts for every particular person program can grow to be messy, typically requiring the redeclaration of check features or the administration of latest check knowledge. With superior scripting, the assessments I executed had been recorded, and scripts had been saved to be reused for different builders working with totally different software program algorithms. I additionally most well-liked options with reusable check parts, AI/ML assist, and modular check creation, which allowed for the personalization of latest assessments as the applying developed.

The listing beneath incorporates real consumer critiques from the Automation Testing Instruments class on G2. It is necessary to notice that distributors providing a free trial are additionally thought of free on this context. 

To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Execute software program assessments
• Run final result reviews
• Evaluate outcomes to earlier assessments
• Conduct assessments a number of occasions all through the day.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques could have been edited for readability.  

As I reviewed G2 suggestions on BrowserStack, I seen customers steadily spotlight its end-to-end check lifecycle framework. Many appear to understand the flexibility to regulate the influence of check suggestions and monitor persistent errors all through the testing course of. I gathered that this structured method helps streamline how QA groups deal with advanced testing phases.

I encountered repeated reward for BrowserStack’s real-device and atmosphere testing. Customers typically level out that the platform goes past emulators and simulators by permitting precise runtime testing of purposes throughout environments. From what I’ve gathered, this offers builders with better confidence in how their apps will carry out as soon as deployed to manufacturing.

Probably the most generally celebrated options is BrowserStack’s device-browser protection. I noticed that customers love entry to over 3,000 mixtures, which makes it straightforward to check on all the pieces from legacy browsers to the newest cellular OS variations. This breadth of protection seems to be a significant differentiator within the cloud testing area.

I additionally picked up on robust suggestions round BrowserStack’s ease of use and integrations. Customers appear to worth the pace at which they’ll log in, choose a check atmosphere, and construct eventualities. Integrations with instruments like Selenium, Appium, and Cypress, in addition to CI/CD pipelines, are steadily talked about as key to aligning check workflows with fashionable improvement practices.  

Based on G2 Knowledge, 82% customers particularly praised BrowserStack’s integration capabilities, noting how seamlessly the software program matches into bigger platforms. I discovered that customers are typically impressed with the pace and reliability of automation. A number of reviewers point out with the ability to automate varied check circumstances with minimal intervention. I gathered that this characteristic provides vital worth for groups aiming to scale their QA efforts with out fixed guide oversight.

What I dislike about BrowserStack

• I gathered that pricing issues occasional testers, with many G2 reviewers mentioning that the plans really feel steep for those who’re not testing a number of codes each day.
• I additionally famous slowdowns and lag throughout high-traffic intervals, which a number of G2 customers reported experiencing as nicely.

What G2 customers dislike about BrowserStack

“We are able to do virtually all the pieces with BrowserStack in UI testing. Nonetheless, it doesn’t assist API testing, Automation, or Guide Testing. It ought to embrace some options for testing of APIs as nicely.”

– BrowserStack Assessment, Ankit Singh P.

As I explored G2 suggestions for the UiPath Platform, I seen that customers steadily spotlight its graphical consumer interface testing capabilities. Many recognize the way it double-checks each visible and textual content parts whereas additionally verifying backend accuracy. This layered testing appears to boost belief within the general high quality of automation workflows.

Visible workflow design is one other characteristic that stands out throughout critiques. Customers appear to understand the intuitive drag-and-drop interface, particularly these with out a heavy coding background. I gathered that this performance lowers the barrier to entry for constructing automation scripts, permitting groups to prototype and iterate quickly.

UiPath’s AI and NLP capabilities are persistently acknowledged for his or her excellence. A number of G2 reviewers point out how these options assist automate contextual testing by understanding consumer conduct and enterprise logic. This seems to be significantly useful in managing advanced QA workflows and guaranteeing knowledge accuracy.

I additionally famous that bot scheduling and efficiency analytics are well-received. Customers say these instruments streamline repeated check execution and cut back errors. A number of reviewers point out with the ability to run iterative check loops reliably throughout platforms, which they credit score for decreasing guide oversight and accelerating deployment.

Many customers observe that UiPath’s studying ecosystem, significantly the UiPath Academy, is a major energy. The vary of tutorials and certifications seems to cater to each inexperienced persons and seasoned customers, with a number of reviewers describing it as a worthwhile useful resource for onboarding and talent improvement.

What I dislike in regards to the UiPath Platform

• I gathered that establishing selectors may be difficult, particularly when switching applications, as customers typically have to create new selectors from scratch.
• Many G2 reviewers point out that choosing the proper check sort or situation is time-consuming, generally requiring assist from the DevOps group for correct check execution.

What G2 customers dislike in regards to the UiPath Platform

“Constructing blocks have their downsides; in some advanced eventualities, it’s arduous to make use of ‘Out of the field’ options, or they grow to be tough to personalize, pushing devs to carry personalised code options, whereas an skilled developer might have the ability to simply discover workarounds, jr devs, and citizen devs could wrestle and really feel restricted.”

– The UiPath Platform Assessment, Edwin B.

Relating to efficiency, I gathered that many reviewers depend on LambdaTest for regression testing and check automation. Customers point out it saves time by automating repetitive duties and monitoring software conduct throughout updates, which proves to be a major effectivity booster for manufacturing groups. Based on G2 Knowledge, 87% customers praised the actionable insights it offers after operating assessments.

I additionally encountered a number of mentions of LambdaTest being excellent for non-coders getting into the testing area. Reviewers spotlight how intuitive and straightforward the platform is to deploy. Based mostly on what I’ve learn, customers worth its simplicity and accessibility, particularly in environments the place not everyone seems to be technically educated

That stated, I seen that LambdaTest delivers dependable automation capabilities, although there are some recurring issues about efficiency throughout peak hours. A number of reviewers, together with myself, noticed occasional lags and delays, however for many day-to-day testing, the platform stays environment friendly and reliable.

I additionally gathered that automation options are typically robust, although a couple of customers, like myself, really feel that incorporating extra superior AI-driven capabilities, comparable to visible regression or picture recognition, might additional improve the expertise. Even so, the present options adequately assist a variety of testing eventualities.

Regardless of these factors, I discovered that LambdaTest stays a user-friendly and approachable platform. For groups looking for an answer that strikes a stability between ease of use and complete testing capabilities, G2 customers persistently view it as a dependable and efficient choice.

What I dislike in regards to the Lambda Take a look at

• I gathered that cellular testing integrations are a standard concern, significantly with Apple Pay and GPS monitoring. G2 customers typically counsel including these options to enhance cellular testing capabilities.
• I additionally famous that session durations can have an effect on check consistency. Many reviewers observe slower execution speeds within the free model, with paid plans providing improved efficiency.

What G2 customers dislike about Lambda Take a look at

“The preliminary configuration generally is a bit difficult to know. It took me a while to navigate the setup course of, however as soon as that hurdle was cleared, the remainder of the expertise was easy.”

– Lambda Take a look at Assessment, Bruno C.

As I reviewed G2 suggestions on Keysight Eggplant, I seen that image-based automation is steadily highlighted as a standout functionality.

Customers seem to understand how the device visually interacts with the front-end interface, enabling them to validate UI parts with out relying solely on code. This method seems significantly helpful for groups conducting cross-device testing of net and cellular purposes.

Many reviewers point out the platform’s optical character recognition (OCR) as a useful characteristic for parsing challenge recordsdata and verifying textual content inside graphical interfaces. G2 customers typically name out how this permits them to automate assessments on dynamic content material and GUIs extra successfully.

I gathered that multi-platform compatibility is one other robust level for customers. A number of critiques reward the device’s flexibility in supporting testing throughout cellular apps, browsers, desktop software program, and enterprise methods. The flexibility to launch and check in assorted environments is seen as a key benefit for groups with numerous software stacks.

The device’s assist for a number of scripting languages, comparable to C++, Python, and JavaScript, is appreciated. This offers improvement groups the liberty to tailor their automation processes based mostly on the languages and platforms they’re already utilizing. Based on G2 Knowledge, 85% of customers praised its means to automate a variety of check sorts as wanted.

That stated, I seen that the platform presents intuitive design and usefulness, making it typically straightforward to navigate for many customers. Whereas pricing generally is a consideration, particularly for smaller groups,  many reviewers highlighted that the platform offers robust worth for bigger enterprise settings with advanced testing wants. General, the platform’s usability and have set make it a worthwhile alternative for groups looking for a complete resolution.

One other facet I noticed is that the platform contains superior options that assist complete testing workflows. A few of these options could require a slight studying curve, and G2 customers typically confer with documentation to raised perceive technical parts. With a little bit of steering, nonetheless, onboarding and mastering these options grow to be a lot smoother, permitting groups to completely use the platform’s capabilities.

On a optimistic observe, I discovered the platform’s responsive buyer assist significantly useful. Whereas occasional queries could take slightly additional time to resolve, the assist group is persistently fast to help and efficient at addressing points, which vastly enhances the general testing expertise.

What I dislike about Keysight Eggplant 

• I seen in G2 critiques that the consumer interface is commonly tough for inexperienced persons, with many customers mentioning a studying curve and the necessity for tutorials to rise up to hurry.
• I additionally noticed that integration with supply code may be difficult. Customers typically point out sluggish load occasions and points testing throughout totally different browsers, which have an effect on effectivity and add additional time to their course of.

What G2 customers dislike about Keysight Eggplant

“The GUI window is not editable. The DAI check captures, however the system does not work. The executable license is just command-line pushed; it will be very good to have a GUI to drag up and schedule a check by way of, go required parameters, and many others. OR even enable the consumer to create a GUI window that’s personalized to the script being known as, to permit the consumer to configure and schedule a check for that script by way of it. FIX the handbook in order that it’s searchable once more! It was nice, after which they broke it, and now it is horrible.”

– Keysight Eggplant, Jessica H.

From what I gathered by way of G2 critiques, customers typically spotlight Katalon Platform’s centralized testing dashboard as a significant comfort. It permits them to handle check campaigns throughout varied methods and net purposes from a single interface. Many reviewers observe that its AI-augmented high quality administration helps enhance the end-user expertise with minimal guide intervention.

I seen that G2 customers recognize Katalon’s drag-and-drop check automation options. Instruments like built-in spy and file functionalities are steadily talked about to facilitate the statement to features, threads, and object declarations throughout check execution. This appears to be significantly useful for these with out superior coding backgrounds.

Based mostly on consumer suggestions, UI aspect seize is one other standout characteristic. Many reviewers point out how straightforward it’s to check dynamic content material and responsive UIs throughout net and cellular apps. I discovered that customers steadily depend on this characteristic when automating visible parts that change in response to consumer interactions or display sizes.

I additionally noticed a number of optimistic mentions of data-driven testing. G2 customers worth connecting to Excel sheets or databases to run a number of iterations of the identical check eventualities with out having to rewrite code. This seems to be a time-saver, particularly for QA groups dealing with massive datasets.

The platform’s keyword-driven testing framework additionally acquired reward. I gathered that customers discover the pre-built key phrases helpful for automating widespread actions, comparable to clicking, verifying textual content, or managing pop-ups. For a lot of, this simplifies the training curve whereas nonetheless providing superior performance.

Reviewers additionally point out Katalon’s assist for cross-platform check automation. A number of customers highlighted its means to run assessments throughout net, cellular, API, and desktop environments, which makes it appropriate for end-to-end check protection in numerous software program ecosystems.

Nonetheless, I seen that Katalon presents in depth integration choices, although integration with open-source instruments can generally be time-consuming. A number of G2 customers, together with myself, have discovered that establishing these integrations sometimes requires additional effort; nonetheless, as soon as configured, they considerably broaden the platform’s flexibility and automation potential.

One other facet I noticed is that the Katalon Runtime Engine (KRE) offers highly effective automation capabilities; nonetheless, configuring it through the command-line interface may be advanced for some customers, particularly in CI/CD pipelines. With a little bit of steering, nonetheless, the setup turns into manageable and helps extra superior testing workflows.

Lastly, I famous that platform efficiency is mostly dependable, although working with very massive check circumstances or sizable initiatives could really feel barely sluggish at occasions. Even so, the system delivers complete check administration, and enhancements in load occasions and check summaries might additional improve usability.

Regardless of these factors, I gathered that G2 customers, together with myself, view Katalon as a complete resolution for automation. With minor refinements in pace and integration, it continues to be a robust, enterprise-ready platform.

What I dislike in regards to the Katalon Platform

• I seen that Katalon’s major check interface may be complicated, requiring an excessive amount of navigation simply to arrange a check case. Many G2 customers echo this sentiment, suggesting that the UI could possibly be extra intuitive.
• Relating to the cellular testing setup, I discovered the method extra advanced than anticipated. G2 reviewers typically point out a steep studying curve on this space, highlighting a necessity for higher onboarding.

What G2 customers dislike in regards to the Katalon Platform

“The draw back of Katalon is that you need to pay for a license if it’s essential do CI/CD integration, Visible testing, and Limitless Analytical outcomes on TestOps (plugin to point out execution consequence).”

– Katalon Platform Assessment, Monish p.

I would urge you to confer with this trustworthy evaluation of the 10 greatest textual content editors in 2025 to grow to be a professional at software program programming.

Shreya Mattoo

Shreya Mattoo is a former Content material Advertising and marketing Specialist at G2. She accomplished her Bachelor’s in Pc Purposes and is now pursuing Grasp’s in Technique and Management from Deakin College. She additionally holds an Advance Diploma in Enterprise Analytics from NSDC. Her experience lies in growing content material round Augmented Actuality, Digital Actuality, Synthetic intelligence, Machine Studying, Peer Assessment Code, and Improvement Software program. She desires to unfold consciousness for self-assist applied sciences within the tech neighborhood. When not working, she is both jamming out to rock music, studying crime fiction, or channeling her inside chef within the kitchen.