There’s a sentence in The Lancet‘s new collection on ultra-processed meals (UPFs), printed this week, that makes clear precisely what the problem with them is. It says that UPFs are;

emblematic of a meals system more and more managed by transnational firms that prioritise company revenue forward of public well being.

That’s not a dietary statement. It’s a political economic system prognosis. And it’s one which governments have been unwilling to make for much too lengthy, though the necessity to take action has been obvious; I’ve been discussing this subject for a while.

Let me spell this out then: we don’t eat UPFs as a result of we lack willpower. We eat them as a result of company energy has redesigned our meals setting to make UPFs unavoidable, low-cost, aggressively marketed, and engineered to undermine our capability to decide on higher. That’s the coronary heart of the matter. We live with a meals system that’s designed to undermine our well being in pursuit of company revenue, and that’s precisely what it’s reaching at monumental prices to us and the state.

This wants some unpacking, as the problem is deeply vital, not least for the longer term well being of the individuals of this nation and the ever-growing prices of the NHS, which UPFs are fuelling.

What UPFs actually are

The Lancet collection repeats what many public well being researchers have been warning for a decade: UPFs will not be merely “meals which are excessive in sugar or fats”. They’re industrial formulations constructed from commodity crops like maize, wheat, soy and palm oil, that are processed into extracts, powders, stabilisers and components, after which mixed with colourings and flavourings, earlier than being packaged in plastic and bought as meals, when they’re nothing like that which we ate just a few many years in the past, and all through human life till then. This isn’t meals; it’s an industrial product designed for shelf life, transport effectivity, and revenue margin. And our our bodies will not be tailored to outlive on them. That’s the downside.

Critics declare that the UPF class is just too broad as a result of it consists of fortified cereals and flavoured yoghurts (which, for my part, are most undoubtedly UPFs). However this misses the purpose fully. UPFs hardly ever exist as particular person merchandise: they kind dietary patterns. As soon as they enter a family, they displace actual meals. The hurt to well being arises from the system. And the system is now dominant.

Within the UK, round half of all energy consumed come from UPFs. In lots of poorer international locations, consumption is rising at alarming charges as world firms push aggressively into newly “liberalised” markets. Extremely-processing is turning into the world’s default weight loss program.

The political economic system of engineered diets

What the Lancet reveals is that UPF consumption will not be an accident. It’s the results of concentrated company energy.

A tiny handful of transnational firms – Nestlé, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Unilever and some others – dominate the worldwide market. Their enterprise mannequin is determined by turning low-cost commodities into branded substances with excessive retail margins. And since their earnings rely on quantity, they market UPFs with relentless depth, usually concentrating on kids, girls, and lower-income households.

Additionally they make them addictive, to the extent that they’re designed in order that they don’t fulfill the longing for meals for lengthy, resulting in extra consumption when that isn’t required, with the weight problems epidemic being the inevitable end result.

The implications are profound:

• Persistent illness has turn into a company externality. Weight problems, diabetes, coronary heart illness and intestine problems are rising as a result of our meals environments have been re-engineered round industrial elements. The NHS pays the invoice. The companies acquire the revenue.
• Inequality shapes what individuals eat. Folks on decrease incomes eat UPFs not as a result of they like them however as a result of the alternate options are unaffordable, inaccessible, or just absent. Low-cost energy have changed nutritious meals as a result of wages are low, rents are excessive, and time is scarce.
• Planetary well being is collateral injury. Industrial processing is fossil-fuel intensive; world provide chains are carbon heavy; and UPFs are wrapped in plastic. These harms are baked into the system.

This isn’t a consumer-choice downside. It’s a structural downside created by deregulation and a meals business allowed to behave with out constraint.

What a authorities that cared would do

The Lancet suggestions are clear. They name for a complete, state-led response that takes company energy severely. Which means:

• Correct regulation. This requires:
  • Entrance-of-pack warning labels.
  • Limits on components that sign ultra-processing.
  • Advertising and marketing bans aimed toward kids, and
  • Restrictions on UPFs in colleges, hospitals, and public establishments.
• Actual competitors coverage would require an finish to business self-regulation.  Dominant companies will should be damaged up if want be. Mergers which have concentrated market energy should be stopped.
• UPFs should be taxed to replicate their social and well being prices.  The income ought to be used to subsidise entire meals and minimally processed meals in order that low-income households are higher off, not worse. Constructive VAT charges on UPFs and damaging VAT charges on actual meals (an concept at present unused, however which is technically potential) might assist handle this subject, creating vital value differentials within the course of.
• Rewriting agricultural coverage might finish subsidies that funnel public cash into commodity crops used for ultra-processing. Assist for native producers, horticulture, group kitchens, and brief provide chains ought to be supplied as a substitute.
• Defending the weak is important, that means that any UPF technique should be designed with fairness at its core. Low-cost industrial energy have changed actual meals as a result of wages have been suppressed, childcare is unaffordable, and time poverty is endemic. You can not change diets with out altering the financial circumstances that form consuming.

Briefly, governments should deal with UPF consumption because the predictable final result of company design and never a failure of particular person selection.

What this tells us in regards to the state we stay in

What worries me most is that the UPF disaster mirrors virtually each different disaster we face.

Whether or not we’re speaking about fossil fuels, monetary markets, non-public fairness in social care, or the rentier takeover of housing, the sample is similar: concentrated company energy reshapes markets and society till the general public carries the price and the non-public sector retains the rewards.

UPFs are merely the edible model of neoliberalism.

If we’re critical about rebuilding public well being, we can’t do it with out rebuilding democratic management over the economic system. Which means acknowledging that meals, and all its well being penalties, is just too vital to be left to markets designed round shareholder return.

The place this leaves us

The Lancet is true: this requires a coordinated world response. However within the UK, we shouldn’t have to attend for the world. A authorities with braveness might act tomorrow. It might pursue the agenda I famous above.

If it doesn’t act, the price is not going to merely be measured in NHS budgets. It is going to be measured within the lives shortened, the communities hollowed out, and the ecological injury that follows from a meals system designed for revenue relatively than care.

Extremely-processed meals is the predictable final result of an financial system that treats individuals as shoppers first and other people second. Altering that isn’t a dietary venture. It’s a democratic one. And it’s lengthy overdue.

Taking additional motion

If you wish to write a letter to your MP on the problems raised on this weblog publish, there’s a ChatGPT immediate to help you in doing so, with full directions, right here.

One phrase of warning, although: please guarantee you’ve got the right MP. ChatGPT can get it flawed.

AI: The way to use it as a campaigner
We’ve got produced a information on the best way to use AI as a campaigner, for which we’re already getting good suggestions. It is obtainable as a free obtain right here. Have a look. We predict you may discover it helpful.

Feedback 

When commenting, please pay attention to this weblog’s remark coverage, which is out there right here. Contravening this coverage will lead to feedback being deleted earlier than or after preliminary publication on the editor’s sole discretion and with out rationalization being required or supplied.