“Tax Equity” is usually utilized in European coverage circles to justify larger taxes. Regardless of being subjective, the which means of “taxA tax is a compulsory cost or cost collected by native, state, and nationwide governments from people or companies to cowl the prices of basic authorities providers, items, and actions. equity” has expanded from being shorthand for combating tax fraud and avoidance to selling a sure imaginative and prescient of redistributive tax coverage. The decision for larger taxes is usually justified by the necessity for extra public items, corresponding to hospitals, colleges, and roads; nonetheless, these are exactly the in-kind advantages which are ignored when defining tax equity to start with.
A welfare state is a system wherein the federal government performs a central position in securing residents’ financial and social well-being via applications corresponding to public well being care, training, pensions, unemployment insurance coverage, and numerous social transfers. However who actually pays for European welfare states? Many assume the reply is apparent: high-income earners contribute whereas low-income earners profit. Nevertheless, that assumption is simply partly true, and infrequently deceptive.
In a brand new, complete evaluation of internet fiscal contributions within the EU,[1] my coauthor Monika Köppl-Turyna and I present a extra real looking view of the fiscal relationship between European households and the state. Our examine reveals that when oblique taxes (corresponding to value-added tax, or VAT) and in-kind advantages (corresponding to well being care and training) are included alongside direct taxes and money transfers, the variety of households labeled as internet contributors to public funds considerably declines.
This extra holistic image ought to shift policymakers’ focus from tax equity to fiscal equity. Fiscal equity is a framework for evaluating financial equity that considers either side of the fiscal equation, taxes paid and contributions made via jobs, funding, and development. It acknowledges that social worth arises not solely from redistribution but in addition from financial exercise.
Measuring the Full Fiscal Footprint
Conventional public finance evaluation usually measures redistribution by evaluating pre-tax and post-tax incomes. This strategy focuses on direct taxes, like earnings or social safety contributions, and transfers, corresponding to unemployment or little one advantages. However this strategy misses two vital options of recent welfare states.
First, it omits oblique taxes, that are paid each time a family consumes. These taxes make up a big share of public revenues throughout the EU international locations (32.4 p.c in 2023 based on EUROSTAT). Second, it overlooks in-kind advantages. These providers are important to households’ well-being and characterize a considerable type of authorities help.
By measuring how a lot households pay in taxes (instantly and not directly), and the way a lot households obtain in advantages (each money and in-kind), we assemble a internet fiscal incidence measure that extra precisely displays the general influence of presidency coverage throughout earnings teams. Our outcomes problem standard knowledge and assist clarify why perceptions of tax equity usually don’t align with fiscal actuality.
Who Are the Web Contributors?
One of many clearest insights from the analysis is that richer households are considerably extra more likely to be internet contributors to the general public purse. In the meantime, households within the decrease and center elements of the earnings distribution, together with these usually described because the “squeezed center,” usually tend to be internet beneficiaries as soon as in-kind advantages are totally accounted for. Whereas they contribute considerably via earnings tax and VAT, the worth of in-kind advantages obtained usually exceeds their complete tax burden by far. Generally, as highlighted within the graph beneath, the variety of internet contributors drops considerably in all EU international locations when in-kind advantages and oblique taxes are accounted for.
This is a crucial characteristic of the welfare state mannequin. Redistribution in Europe takes place not solely via money transfers, but in addition via common entry to public providers. These providers, although much less seen than month-to-month profit funds, type the spine of social help in most EU international locations.
In-Variety Advantages and VAT Are the Hidden Redistributors
In-kind advantages are one of many largest drivers of redistribution in most international locations. Common entry to well being care and training generates substantial advantages, notably for lower-income households, whereas being financed collectively, primarily via broad-based taxes like earnings taxes and VAT.
Oblique taxes like VAT are sometimes criticized as regressive as a result of lower-income households are inclined to spend a bigger share of their earnings on consumption. Nevertheless, in a latest examine of European international locations,[2] we present that this regressive impact is proscribed and, crucially, greater than offset by the progressive influence of in-kind advantages.
Throughout the EU, earnings inequality (in disposable earnings) varies broadly when measured by the Gini index. Earlier than accounting for in-kind advantages and VAT, inequality ranges broadly. When public providers and oblique taxes are factored in, Gini values drop noticeably throughout all international locations, by roughly 3 to six factors on common, exhibiting the equalizing influence of presidency transfers and social advantages. The smallest gaps between disposable earnings and post-transfer measures seem in additional redistributive programs, corresponding to Belgium, Finland, and Austria. The biggest gaps happen in Bulgaria, Latvia, and Luxembourg, the place inequality stays comparatively excessive even after transfers.
Briefly, VAT might barely increase inequality by itself, however when paired with common public providers, it turns into a part of a strongly redistributive system. This exhibits that, regardless of the widespread framing, tax effectivity just isn’t essentially antithetical to a authorities’s given social objectives. A tax system that depends on impartial, broad-based devices like VAT can nonetheless obtain fiscal equity if the spending facet is well-designed and focused.
Belief, Notion, and Coverage
As mentioned in a latest interview sequence, public notion of who pays and who advantages usually shapes political debate greater than the information. However, in actuality, many households are internet beneficiaries of the welfare states as soon as all parts—money advantages, providers, and taxes—are included.
Such misperceptions undermine public belief and cut back political help for reforms that might enhance effectivity, sustainability, or transparency. A slender concentrate on earnings tax charges alone can result in distorted conclusions and poor coverage. Fiscal equity is a greater framework for analyzing coverage design.
Rethinking Equity and Sustainability
This broader understanding additionally highlights a long-term problem. If the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants are internet beneficiaries over their lifetimes, then the fiscal system relies upon disproportionately on the contributions of a small share of high-income earners. This locations actual limits on how far redistribution can go with out risking disincentives, capital flight, or a narrowing tax baseThe tax base is the entire quantity of earnings, property, belongings, consumption, transactions, or different financial exercise topic to taxation by a tax authority. A slender tax base is non-neutral and inefficient. A broad tax base reduces tax administration prices and permits extra income to be raised at decrease charges..
Sustainable redistribution requires a system that isn’t solely honest, but in addition environment friendly and growth-friendly. And these targets are suitable, however provided that tax and spending insurance policies are based mostly on information, not assumptions.
The controversy over who funds the welfare states shouldn’t relaxation on rhetoric or partial information. Redistribution is extra in depth, and extra advanced, than generally perceived. It’s pushed not simply by progressive earnings taxation, however by the mixture of impartial taxes and universally accessible public providers. Understanding that is key to designing tax programs that aren’t solely sustainable and pro-growth, but in addition perceived as official by those that finance and depend on them.
Keep knowledgeable on the tax insurance policies impacting you.
Subscribe to get insights from our trusted consultants delivered straight to your inbox.
References
[1] Michael Christl and Monika Köppl‐Turyna, “Web Fiscal Contributions within the EU—The Function of Oblique Taxation and In‐Variety Advantages,” Kyklos 78:4 (2025): 1607-1636.
[2] Michael Christl, Silvia De Poli, and Monika Köppl–Turyna, “An prolonged view on inequality and redistribution within the European Union—The position of oblique taxation and in-kind advantages,” Financial Evaluation and Coverage (2025).
Share this text
