Welcome to YC Enviornment, which isn’t a high secret combat membership for Y Combinator founders, however a collection of video games that provide you with a obscure sense of what it’s wish to be a companion at YC.
Created by a pupil in Berlin, YC Enviornment’s YC Accomplice Simulator sport reveals you a publicly obtainable pitch video from an organization that utilized to YC, together with the 12 months of their software. You click on “settle for” or “reject,” after which discover out should you made the identical selection as YC.
It’s loads tougher than it seems to be. YC is estimated to simply accept round 1% of candidates, and at a sure level, some luck is required to actually seize a companion’s eye — possibly your pitch is the primary {that a} companion watched after a really rejuvenating espresso break, or possibly your organization is the final video on the checklist, and everybody’s drained.
“Many rejected founders went on to construct extremely profitable corporations afterwards,” reads a observe at first of the sport. “Rejection means nothing – even essentially the most profitable founders acquired rejected a number of instances.”
YC Enviornment has different video games that ask you to match an organization title to its brand, or guess what 12 months an organization did YC based mostly on its description (spoiler alert: there’s much more AI in recent times). However the YC Accomplice Simulator sport is essentially the most fascinating because it makes us confront our personal decision-making processes.
As a tech journalist, I assumed I might be fairly good on the YC Accomplice Simulator. I might not be an investor, however I do know what it’s wish to sift by an inbox filled with startup pitches and select which of them pique my curiosity — I’ve walked the ground of TechCrunch Disrupt’s Battlefield 200 Expo with the duty of figuring out corporations to interview and write about. However this sport is tough. In spite of everything, we’re working inside totally different parameters, because the newsworthiness of an organization will not be straight tied to its potential to show a revenue.
(For instance: as I write this, there’s an AI pet sitting in my lap that I’m planning to evaluation. Would I put cash on the guess that Casio will flip a revenue off of the funding it takes to create a glorified Furby that retails for $430? No. Do I count on that an article about my life with an AI pet will likely be fascinating to readers? Sure.)
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
If something, the sport reveals simply how subjective these processes will be. However after I learn YC co-founder Paul Graham’s software information, my guesses began to get extra correct.
“You need to be exceptionally clear and concise,” Graham wrote. “No matter you must say, give it to us proper within the first sentence, within the easiest potential phrases.” (For the file, this recommendation additionally applies to emailing journalists.)
I performed the sport once more, however this time, I paid much less consideration to what the corporate was pitching and extra consideration to how shortly they may convey what their firm does. After all, I wouldn’t suggest this technique for evaluating a startup in actual life (scorching take: it’s best to care what an organization does!), however for the needs of the sport, I ended up selecting an organization’s destiny extra precisely.
This most likely isn’t a coincidence. When OpenAI founder and CEO Sam Altman was president of YC, he remarked in an interview that the incubator spent simply 10 minutes reviewing every firm’s software to decide.
“It seems that in 10 minutes, if the one query you’re attempting to reply is, ‘Does this particular person have the potential to be the following Mark Zuckerberg?’ … You’ll be able to reply that query in 10 minutes,” Altman stated in 2016. “Not with 100% accuracy, clearly, however ok that our enterprise mannequin works.”
