I evaluated 10 instruments utilizing G2 Knowledge and opinions to finalize the ten finest free password managers for small companies. These are 1Password, Bitwarden, Dashlane Password Supervisor, Hudu, Keeper Password Supervisor, LastPass, NordPass Enterprise, Rippling IT, RoboForm, and TeamPassword.

Operating a small enterprise means you are additionally the safety group and must juggle a number of login credentials.

Shared logins sit in a spreadsheet, a chat thread, or one trusted worker’s reminiscence, and each rent or departure turns right into a spherical of resetting and hoping. The most effective free password managers for small companies shut that hole with out including a line to the funds.

I labored by 10 instruments that provide free plans or free trials, studying a number of verified small-business opinions for every to grasp what every free tier truly contains, the place the most important limitations seem, and which companies get probably the most worth earlier than needing to improve.

This information explains what every plan covers, the place its limits seem, and which product finest matches the best way your online business works.

In accordance with Verizon’s 2025 Knowledge Breach Investigations Report SMB Snapshot, the usage of stolen credentials is the one most typical hacking motion in small- and mid-sized enterprise breaches, accounting for 33% of them, barely forward of enormous organizations at 32%.

What I search for in free password managers for small companies

After reviewing 10 instruments on this class, the sample that separates a usable free plan from a glorified demo turns into exhausting to overlook. These six checks determined the listing:

• Free-tier room for an actual group: Most free password managers are constructed for one individual, so the very first thing I checked is whether or not the free plan or trial truly covers a number of customers. A free plan that caps out at a single seat or a single machine kind tells a 10-person firm nothing about how the instrument will behave on day one.
• Safe sharing that replaces the spreadsheet: Small groups continually share the identical social, banking, and vendor logins, and the choice to a password supervisor is normally a chat message or a shared sheet. I search for shared vaults or folders that work on the free plan, with the flexibility at hand a teammate entry with out ever exhibiting them the password itself.
• Admin visibility with out an IT division: In an organization of fifty or fewer individuals, the IT admin is commonly the proprietor or somebody with technical information. I examine whether or not the admin console reveals who has entry to what on a single display, and whether or not revoking a departing worker’s entry takes minutes reasonably than a password-reset marathon.
• Setup and onboarding a non-technical group can survive: Small-business reviewers on G2 repeatedly reward instruments they may roll out with out coaching and abandon instruments that felt daunting to show. I hint the import path from browsers and different managers, and the way shortly a brand new teammate can get to saving and filling logins.
• Autofill and browser-extension reliability each day: Autofill is the place password managers earn or lose belief. G2 opinions name out field-detection misses on cost pages and login types as their high day by day friction. I examine every extension’s habits in Chrome and not less than one different browser, and word the place the shape breaks.
• The place the free plan’s wall sits: Most free tiers finish someplace, normally at shared folders, person counts, or admin insurance policies. I doc the precise set off that forces an improve and the value of the primary paid tier, as a result of for a small enterprise the actual query is just not “is it free” however “how lengthy is it free for the best way we work.”

To qualify for inclusion within the Password Supervisor class, a product should:

• Retailer and save passwords for web sites and functions
• Automate the filling of password types or logins
• Present instruments for securely sharing credentials
• Combine with browsers or operate atop functions
• Permit customers to create, change, or randomize passwords

This information was pulled from G2 in 2026. Some opinions could have been edited for readability.

1Password approaches password administration from a team-first perspective reasonably than a person one. As an alternative of treating passwords as one thing every worker manages individually, it organizes credentials into shared vaults that maintain private logins distinct from firm entry. Vaults separate private logins from group credentials, and reviewers describe apps that really feel native in every single place.

What I paid probably the most consideration to was how 1Password behaves when a group, not an individual, is determined by it. What stood out to me was constant: rollout to the entire firm with out coaching, browser imports that carry all the pieces over, and credential sharing that replaces pasting passwords into chat. It’s a instrument constructed for on a regular basis collaboration reasonably than occasional password storage.

The place 1Password genuinely stands out:

• It stands out with regards to group onboarding with out an IT division. Small-business reviewers persistently describe rolling 1Password out company-wide themselves, importing browser and telephone passwords, and instructing it to teammates with out coaching.
• I additionally see nice cross-platform consistency. G2 customers repeatedly name out similar habits throughout ChromeOS, Home windows, Linux, macOS, and cellular, with quick report syncing between units.

What G2 customers like about 1Password:

“1Password is likely one of the software program instruments that’s a part of my day-to-day, hour-by-hour methods of working. From storing all my entry logins to sharing credentials with teammates. It is a great product that works seamlessly on each my desktop and cellular units. I am an enormous fan. I’ve by no means had a must contact help, as it really works so properly and, because the individual answerable for onboarding colleagues onto the platform, that is additionally tremendous easy and straightforward to handle. The person expertise is easy and straightforward to make use of, and it integrates with Chrome and a lot of the desktop functions I take advantage of.”

– 1Password evaluate, Roger B.

What I dislike about 1Password:

• I seen a couple of recurring tough spots round password administration, primarily with monitoring credentials and telling related accounts aside. If I had been managing numerous related logins, I might count on to spend extra time discovering the fitting one. With a smaller, organized vault, although, looking stays fast and straightforward.
• Pricing for private use got here up repeatedly in G2 opinions, particularly amongst customers paying out of pocket. If I solely wanted a password supervisor for myself, I might weigh the fee extra rigorously. The worth improves on household plans and office subscriptions, the place the safety features are shared throughout a number of customers.

What G2 customers dislike about 1Password:

“A small proportion of internet sites appear to dam pasting passwords, which may stop 1Password from filling within the username and password mechanically. That is particularly irritating if you’re utilizing safe passwords, since they are often clunky and time-consuming to kind out by hand.”

– 1Password evaluate, Gary LaBelle, VP for Operations

Bitwarden is open supply, which implies its code is publicly audited, and that transparency has constructed a following amongst cost-conscious groups that need safety they will confirm. It ran in every single place I attempted it, from browser extensions to the choice of a self-hosted server for companies that need the vault on their very own {hardware}.

The query I dropped at my testing was how far $0 truly stretches, and the free plan answered it quick: limitless logins, limitless units, and browser autofill that held up by per week of on a regular basis use. The opinions mirror what I noticed within the interface: a number of reviewers name it purposeful however dated. I hit the actual improve choice the second greater than two individuals must share credentials.

The place Bitwarden genuinely stands out:

• Open-source transparency builds belief. Small-business reviewers repeatedly cite the audited, open codebase as the explanation they picked Bitwarden over slicker rivals.
• The free tier does actual work. Many reviewers say the free model feels full sufficient for on a regular basis use as a substitute of a stripped-down introduction.

What G2 customers like about Bitwarden:

“I take advantage of Bitwarden to retailer my passwords and generate new ones. The most important profit I discovered is the autofill characteristic, as I need not enter the username and password each time I entry pages; with a easy shortcut, it is accomplished, which streamlines routines. Moreover, I discovered the preliminary setup extraordinarily simple, because it was only a matter of putting in the extension and creating the account.”

– Bitwarden evaluate, Matheus M.

What I dislike about Bitwarden:

• Autofill often misses the mark, with banking and monetary web sites arising most frequently in G2 opinions. If I relied on these websites on daily basis, I might count on to fill a couple of passwords manually. For many different web sites, although, autofill works reliably and cuts down on repetitive typing.
• The interface additionally receives some criticism for wanting dated in comparison with newer password managers. If a contemporary design issues to me, I might discover the distinction. If I care extra about safety and reliability, although, the interface will get the job accomplished with out getting in the best way.

What G2 customers dislike about Bitwarden:

“With out first reviewing the coaching supplies, it may be a bit complicated to determine easy methods to grant entry and share firm info with the customers who want it. After going by the coaching supplies, although, I noticed I should not have jumped proper in; I’d have been higher off taking even a quick tutorial first. From there, the efficiency is superb, and all of it is sensible now!”

– Bitwarden evaluate, Jessica R.

Dashlane Password Supervisor approaches credentials the best way a safety advisor would: retailer them, sure, but additionally grade them. What stood out to me is how the Password Well being dashboard and darkish net monitoring maintain rating of each weak, reused, or leaked login throughout the corporate, turning password hygiene from a obscure fear right into a quantity somebody can personal. The entire product now lives within the browser, with no desktop app to keep up.

Dashlane matches the small enterprise that wishes software program to police password hygiene on its behalf. I persistently single out the automated password technology, the Password Well being rating, and darkish net alerts because the options that proceed to work after the novelty wears off.

The flip facet reveals up simply as persistently: its browser-only path means anybody who wants credentials outdoors a browser, for distant desktop protocol (RDP) periods or legacy methods may really feel the constraint. This nonetheless works properly for a web-first firm.

The place Dashlane Password Supervisor genuinely stands out:

• Safety that displays itself. G2 reviewers repeatedly credit score the Password Well being dashboard and darkish net monitoring with catching weak and compromised credentials earlier than individuals do.
• The browser expertise stays constant throughout units. I noticed G2 customers spotlight that any browser turns into a safe workspace with no native set up to babysit, helpful for companies with shared or rotating {hardware}.

What G2 customers like about Dashlane Password Supervisor:

“It is good to have your whole passwords in a single place, and never fear about safety. You’ll be able to at all times examine in case your password has been leaked, and use the platform to generate passwords with particular character necessities. It is also simple to ask your group and regulate their password well being as properly.”

– Dashlane Password Supervisor evaluate, Marina Uchenik, Operations Supervisor

What I dislike about Dashlane Password Supervisor:

• I seen autofill on Dashlane would not at all times pull the fitting particulars, and reviewers level to that as a supply of friction when managing a number of accounts directly. Groups or people juggling many overlapping logins could really feel that inaccuracy most. Customers with a smaller, tidier set of accounts, although, get autofill that stays correct and saves actual time.
• I noticed a recurring theme in G2 opinions round password search and autofill consistency, with reviewers describing each as tougher to depend on than anticipated. Customers who must shortly find one password amongst lots of could discover that friction first. Customers with a leaner vault, although, get a search and autofill expertise that is quick and reliable.

What G2 customers dislike about Dashlane Password Supervisor:

“I do not suppose the browser extension is the very best. I want I might edit passwords with out being taken to a separate net web page, and Dashlane is not built-in with something I take advantage of.”

– Dashlane Password Supervisor evaluate, Nicholas Boyd, Techniques Administrator

I admire a instrument that is sincere about what it’s, and Hudu leads with it: an IT documentation platform first, a password supervisor second.

Passwords dwell inside a much bigger map of your online business, linked to the server they unlock, the consumer they belong to, and the method doc that explains them. Self-hosting is a first-class possibility for groups that need the vault on their very own infrastructure.

Hudu is sensible, in my opinion, for a selected form of small enterprise: the one managing IT for itself or for shoppers, the place the query is rarely simply “what’s the password” however “what’s it for”. The opinions I learn describe documenting complete consumer environments, linking passwords to property and information base articles, and self-hosting for safety management.

In case your group simply wants shared logins for a dozen software-as-a-service (SaaS) apps, that is extra platform than the job requires; for those who’re drowning in undocumented infrastructure, it is the one instrument on this listing I discovered that fixes each issues directly.

The place Hudu genuinely stands out:

• Its self-hosting and information management capabilities are nice. Reviewers repeatedly select Hudu particularly to run the vault on their very own infrastructure for safety causes.
• I might additionally spotlight the connectivity. Reviewers name out linking passwords to property, shoppers, and knowledge-base articles because the workflow change that made documentation stick.

What G2 customers like about Hudu:

“Self-hosted management and possession of documentation information, mixed with a clear API that makes it easy to combine with automation platforms like n8n. The asset format system is versatile sufficient to mannequin MSP-specific relationships (shoppers → agreements → units), and the KB construction retains operational docs accessible with out preventing the editor. For an MSP managing delicate consumer environments, having the documentation platform on our personal infrastructure reasonably than SaaS is a major benefit.”

– Hudu evaluate, Mark H.

What I dislike about Hudu:

• I seen recurring suggestions round search capabilities, with some reviewers wanting deeper search and smoother integrations. If I had been managing a big documentation library, I might most likely really feel these limitations extra. For a smaller, well-organized information base, although, navigation stays fast and easy.
• Integration setup additionally takes extra effort than some reviewers count on, and a broader vary of native integrations is a standard request. If I relied on a various tech stack, I might possible spend extra time getting all the pieces linked. With a leaner set of instruments, although, the setup course of stays easy.

What G2 customers dislike about Hudu:

“We had points with getting the built-in S3 exports to work accurately and ended up utilizing Linux instructions on the host server to get the exports the best way we needed them. Including the flexibility to make use of different information storage sources resembling Backblaze could be tremendously useful.”

– Hudu evaluate, James S.

Keeper Password Supervisor comes from a safety firm that additionally sells privileged entry administration to enterprises, and I might see that lineage throughout its opinions. Zero-knowledge encryption, role-based permissions, and audit-friendly controls are the core of the product. What stunned me most was the value: the Enterprise Starter tier undercuts practically all the pieces else on this roundup.

I might level Keeper at small companies that need enterprise-style guardrails with out an enterprise invoice. Group-based rights that make discovering and assigning entry quick, autofill that logs individuals in earlier than the web page finishes loading, and generated passwords lengthy sufficient that no one pretends to memorize them are nice to have.

The place Keeper Password Supervisor genuinely stands out:

• Autofill is quick and reliable, with G2 opinions describing Keeper logging them within the second a web page masses, utilizing generated 20-character passwords they by no means have to the touch.
• I might level to the group-based entry rights as properly. Reviewers spotlight assigning rights by group so day by day entry stays quick whereas management stays with the proprietor.

What G2 customers like about Keeper Password Supervisor:

“What I like finest about Keeper is its excellent mix of safety, usability, and scalability. The platform’s zero-knowledge structure offers me confidence that delicate credentials are at all times safe, whereas the intuitive interface makes it simple for each technical and non-technical customers to undertake. Options like role-based entry controls, safe password sharing, and detailed audit logs make it a superb match for organizational use. I additionally admire the seamless integration with browsers, cellular units, and SSO/MFA instruments—Keeper simply works, and it really works very well.”

– Keeper Password Supervisor evaluate, Johan Fick, Director, Digital Options

What I dislike about Keeper Password Supervisor:

• Enhancing and producing passwords inside Keeper’s browser extension takes extra steps than customers count on. Frequent password updates make that friction add up, whereas groups with a secure set of credentials get a vault that stays safe and straightforward to keep up.
• Altering passwords or organising new credentials is the place autofill barely lags, primarily based on what G2 customers describe. Groups onboarding numerous new accounts will really feel that hole, however these with a steadier set of logins get autofill that works reliably each day.

What G2 customers dislike about Keeper Password Supervisor:

“Some superior options like darkish net monitoring and safe file storage require paid add-ons. The free tier could be very restricted and pricing is increased than common.”

– Keeper Password Supervisor evaluate, Oren Azar, Infrastructure Safety Supervisor

LastPass‘s free plan lets me revisit it the best way most small companies first encounter it, by the browser popup one worker already makes use of at dwelling. Its folder-based sharing mannequin maps neatly onto how small firms truly set up themselves, by consumer, by function, and by undertaking, with permissions controlling who sees what.

For me, LastPass earns its place on this listing with its sharing mechanics. Change a password as soon as, and it updates mechanically for everybody with entry. Contractors can use shared credentials with out ever seeing the precise password. Two caveats surfaced simply as usually in my testing and studying: the free tier locked me to a single machine kind, so I might deal with it as an analysis reasonably than a group plan, and the 2022 breach nonetheless colours how some reviewers discuss belief, even ones who stayed.

The place LastPass genuinely stands out:

• Password updates keep in sync. Password adjustments propagate to the entire group mechanically, so shared credentials by no means go stale. Customers additionally admire having the ability to share entry with out revealing the password itself.
• Acquainted, low-friction day by day use. The browser popup, search, and autofill work quietly within the background, making the instrument simple to neglect till it is wanted.

What G2 customers like about LastPass:

“It is likely one of the finest software program choices for password administration. In terms of creating a brand new password, it suggests a powerful, appropriate password and in addition gives the choice to put it aside immediately. One other helpful characteristic is that it might probably auto-fill login particulars, so there is no want to repeat and paste your credentials each time you check in.”

– LastPass evaluate, Deepak A.

What I dislike about LastPass:

• Password size limits and autofill accuracy come up collectively in G2 suggestions, every creating a couple of further hurdles. If groups relied on lengthy, advanced passwords throughout dozens of web sites, they’d discover these limitations extra. For traditional password wants, although, autofill stays dependable and saves time.
• Autofill would not work persistently throughout each app, with G2 customers describing occasional login failures that require a guide sign-in. If customers relied on a broad mixture of apps, they’d run into these interruptions extra usually. With a smaller, well-tested app stack, although, logging in stays fast and reliable.

What G2 customers dislike about LastPass:

“What I dislike about LastPass is the safety incidents up to now, which harm belief for a product constructed round defending information. It may additionally really feel sluggish or buggy at instances, particularly with browser extensions, and a few helpful options have been moved behind the paid plan, which frustrates long-time customers. Total, it really works, however these points make you suppose twice about counting on it totally.”

– LastPass evaluate, Priyanshu Sharma, Admin

The toughest a part of adopting a password supervisor isn’t the software program; it is shifting an entire group onto it. What drew me to NordPass Enterprise is that it treats that migration as its fundamental occasion. Constructed by the corporate behind NordVPN, it inherits the household trait of consumer-grade ease wrapped round business-grade safety, and it is much less about characteristic lists and extra about how little resistance the rollout meets.

My first transfer off sticky notes and Slack messages went extra easily than anybody anticipated. G2 reviewers additionally name out the one-file import from LastPass, autofill that fetches credentials earlier than anybody varieties, and an admin panel that offers the proprietor visibility with out demanding an IT background.

The recurring requests I noticed had been for deeper integrations past the browser extension and extra granular sharing controls. Groups with advanced permission wants ought to maintain these limitations in thoughts earlier than committing.

The place NordPass Enterprise genuinely stands out:

• Shifting from one other password supervisor is simple. Small-business reviewers describe exporting an previous password database and importing it into NordPass in a single easy go, licenses and customers included.
• Adoption throughout non-technical groups. Practically everybody within the group picked it up with out coaching, changing passwords on sticky notes and in chat threads.

What G2 customers like about NordPass Enterprise:

“I discover the UI, the Chrome extension, and the flexibility to handle hierarchy actually useful. It is very quick and straightforward to make use of, and pricing could be very affordable. The safety reporting, resembling stopping information publicity, is actually good.”

– NordPass Enterprise evaluate, Naz Haque, Enterprise & Advertising and marketing Coach

What I dislike about NordPass Enterprise:

• Misplaced passwords and autofill hiccups happen on sure units, and G2 suggestions signifies that NordPass’s cross-device expertise wants extra consistency. Combined machine varieties and working methods really feel that almost all, whereas groups standardized on one ecosystem, get password administration that stays dependable each day.
• Pulling up saved passwords would not at all times work on the primary attempt, a reliability hole a number of G2 customers describe. That issues most when prompt entry throughout many accounts is the day by day want, however customers with a smaller, well-organized vault get fast entry to the passwords they use most.

What G2 customers dislike about NordPass Enterprise:

“Nicely, typically the browser extension disconnects and asks for the grasp password too regularly, which delays sure processes. If somebody loses the grasp password, the restoration course of could be tedious. There are not any customized folders, and I want to have a couple of extra choices on this regard.”

– NordPass Enterprise evaluate, Angel B.

Password administration is just one piece of what Rippling IT affords, however it’s a significant one for small companies. RPass, its built-in vault, rides together with single sign-on, machine administration, and automatic onboarding, so an worker’s passwords, app entry, and laptop computer all observe the identical lifecycle. For a small enterprise, I believe that reframes the query from “the place will we maintain passwords” to “who manages entry to all the pieces”.

It permits groups to order, configure, and retrieve laptops from one display, groups whose new hires had each account ready on day one. RPass retains shared logins constant alongside the best way.

The place Rippling IT genuinely stands out:

• Onboarding and offboarding keep remarkably organized. On G2, small-business customers repeatedly level to day-one provisioning and painless offboarding, even with out a devoted IT admin.
• Managing logins throughout apps takes far much less effort. G2 customers spotlight how the SSO portal and RPass get rid of many password requests, with worker updates flowing mechanically to linked apps.

What G2 customers like about Rippling IT:

“With the ability to provision and handle worker accounts for different software program inside Rippling is a lifesaver. That method I simply must replace an worker’s information as soon as and it ripples out to the opposite softwares they’re linked to. I additionally use RPass and love utilizing it for password saving and sharing. It takes a little bit of time to get arrange, however when you’re in, you are golden.”

– Rippling IT evaluate, Stephanie D.

What I dislike about Rippling IT:

• Credential sharing and password administration help are the gaps G2 customers level to in Rippling IT’s present characteristic set. Groups needing broad credential sharing throughout the group will really feel that almost all, whereas these managing easier, centralized machine and app workflows get an IT toolset that stays targeted and straightforward to run.
• I noticed a recurring theme in G2 opinions round course of visibility, password administration, and workflow circumstances, with reviewers wanting extra depth in every space. If customers are operating advanced, conditional IT workflows, they might discover these gaps most. Customers with extra standardized IT processes, although, get a toolset that covers the day-to-day necessities with out added complexity.

What G2 customers dislike about Rippling IT:

“Whereas there are a number of optimizing elements utilizing Rippling IT, there are some areas of enchancment that Rippling can and is conscious of. MDM instructions are sturdy however can take a number of minutes to speak with the top customers pc / servers and again. Rippling IT’s machine warehouse provision turnaround for brand new units are longer than desired. RPass is useful in sharing frequent web site credentials with co-workers/admins however can not cease saved passwords on the browser degree if not initially meant to be shared.”

– Rippling IT evaluate, Alexander S.

The place most instruments cease at usernames and passwords, RoboForm accomplished complete deal with blocks, bank card fields, and multi-page functions throughout my testing. For small companies that dwell in vendor portals, insurance coverage types, and consumer methods, that is day by day time again.

I might match RoboForm with small companies that need utility over polish. I additionally see an admin console that makes granting and eradicating worker entry easy because the group adjustments, group-based sharing with digital assistants, and a kind filler they name finest at school.

The place RoboForm genuinely stands out:

• Type filling is considered one of RoboForm’s greatest strengths. Small-business reviewers persistently name out full deal with and bank card autofill because the characteristic different password managers battle to match.
• Managing worker entry stays easy. The admin console makes it fast to grant entry to new hires and revoke it when staff or contractors go away.

What G2 customers like about RoboForm:

“The most effective half is the shape filler. Whereas most instruments solely save passwords, RoboForm is extremely good at filling in complete deal with and bank card types completely. The admin console can be simple to make use of and nice as a result of it makes it quite simple to present or take away entry for workers each time our group adjustments.”

– RoboForm evaluate, Kaushik M.

What I dislike about RoboForm:

• I seen the interface feels a bit dated subsequent to newer rivals, and reviewers instructed a extra fashionable, intuitive redesign would assist. Groups that prioritize a extremely polished, modern look could discover that hole first. Groups targeted on core performance over visible polish, although, get a instrument that will get the job accomplished reliably.
• Reviewers describe hassle preserving observe of up to date passwords and dealing with duplicate entries. Customers managing a big, regularly altering set of credentials could really feel that friction most. Coping with a smaller, extra secure password listing works higher.

What G2 customers dislike about RoboForm:

“I discover saving the passwords or when the passwords are up to date to be problematic. I even have a number of logins for a similar web site, which is annoying. It will be higher if RoboForm might acknowledge when it is the identical web site and replace the login by default as a substitute of making one other one.”

– RoboForm evaluate, Andrei P.

TeamPassword is constructed round a easy concept: sharing passwords should not be sophisticated. There are not any vault hierarchies to design or insurance policies to tune, simply teams, information, and an exercise log that reveals who touched what. It is the instrument for the enterprise that retains selecting the spreadsheet as a result of all the pieces else looks like homework.

The three-to-15-person store sharing utility accounts, social logins, and consumer portals is precisely who I might hand TeamPassword to. It really works in a method that helps substitute an Excel sheet in a day, sharing credentials with exterior collaborators by teams, and monitoring who accessed which password by the exercise log.

The place TeamPassword genuinely stands out:

• Sharing with individuals outdoors the corporate. G2 suggestions highlights teams that stretch to exterior collaborators and digital assistants with out handing over the precise passwords.
• Accountability by the exercise log. You’ll be able to see who accessed which password and when and that made a shared vault reliable. For groups with a number of individuals utilizing the identical credentials, that visibility issues.

What G2 customers like about TeamPassword:

“I like that I will entry my passwords confidently with TeamPassword and admire the sense of safety it gives. It is very handy that the OTPs are available for me to only copy and paste, which saves me effort and time. As a graphic designer, I do not get pleasure from doing a variety of administrative duties, so having these options readily accessible by TeamPassword cuts me some slack. It was additionally fairly simple to arrange, which was a reduction.”

– TeamPassword evaluate, River Suarez

What I dislike about TeamPassword:

• I seen frequent logouts present up in opinions, although reviewers acknowledge the intent behind it’s added safety. Groups that want to remain logged in by lengthy, uninterrupted work periods could really feel that friction most. Customers prioritizing strict session safety, although, get a safeguard that retains accounts locked down precisely when it issues.

What G2 customers dislike about TeamPassword:

“Consistently logs you out, however I get it for security causes.”

– TeamPassword evaluate, Connor B.

Discover the finest multi-factor authentication (MFA) software program on G2 to place that second lock on each login your group simply secured.