I’m personally pro-tech and use AI day by day. I’m genuinely excited by progressive instruments that increase what creators and companies can do.

However the tempo of what’s occurring — and how it’s being rolled out — has been eye-jarring: creators sidelined, copyright murky at finest, implementation racing forward of consent.

Proper now it appears like a land-grab: who can transfer sooner, get bigger, be taught extra, prepare extra — too usually at society’s expense.

That’s the backdrop to the ultimate keynote at SXSW Sydney 2025, a fireplace interview the place OpenAI’s chief of world affairs (ie. geopolitical threat administration boss), Chris Lehane, was interviewed by the AFR’s Paul Smith.

Lehane provided a elegant imaginative and prescient of “the age of intelligence” and a greater world in 25 years. The subtext: historical past exhibits every revolution trumps the final, so adaptation is everybody’s duty — and when you don’t adapt, that’s on you.

Listed below are the most important takeaways — and why I’m not totally shopping for the story once we can design higher world floor up from the start.

OpenAI’s Chris Lehane

Lehane talked about “democratising AI,” but OpenAI’s fashions are skilled on the work of tens of millions of creators with out consent — writers, designers, journalists, musicians — whose expertise at the moment are quietly being automated, their livelihoods eroded. The corporate frames this as a mistake, or a matter of authorized interpretation.

The sample is evident: take first, apologise later.

He assured the viewers that OpenAI will create extra new jobs, not destroy them — that each technological leap has performed so.

“To not be Pollyannaish,” he added, earlier than acknowledging that, sure, some folks will be displaced. However to not fear, there will likely be new “marketplaces” for coaching, certifications, and “AI literacy.”

In different phrases, the identical firm that disrupted your trade will now promote you the toolkit to outlive in it.

It’s a intelligent sleight of hand — an ethical outsourcing. Governments should resolve how you can regulate. Societies should adapt. Employees should retrain.

OpenAI simply builds the instruments. And if the world struggles to catch up, properly, that’s not their fault.

Lehane’s optimism stretched 25 years into the longer term.

By then, he mentioned, AI can have cured most cancers, solved schooling, and powered abundance.

Everybody will “stay the great life.”

However there’s a darker query lurking beneath that imaginative and prescient: what occurs when the following era not learns how to do issues? When each act of creation, restore, or discovery is lowered to a voice command or a immediate?

Will we nonetheless know how you can construct, train, or write, or will these expertise quietly vanish, outsourced to invisible techniques we not perceive? If AI turns into the hand that paints, the voice that sings, the thoughts that solves — what, then, turns into of ours?

Lehane spoke of human-led design, of placing folks on the centre of this transformation. However to this point, humanity hasn’t been main; it’s been reacting.

The roles are already disappearing. The talents hole is widening. The techniques are studying sooner than the folks they’re presupposed to serve.

Because the lights dimmed, the group clapped and laughed, not out of awe, however irony. After Smith’s push for actual solutions on copyright and AI’s impression, all he bought was hope.

When he closed with “we hope the world will get higher,” the room knew that was all they’d been given.

OpenAI’s imaginative and prescient guarantees a greater world — if we simply belief them, if we simply sustain. But each revolution has its value. And earlier than we let one other wave of “innovation” wash over us, maybe the true query will not be what AI will create — however what it would take alongside the best way.

• George Hedon is the founding father of Pause Fest and the Pause Awards.