A vendor will get breached. You discover out two weeks later. Now you are caught answering to management with nothing however an outdated spreadsheet and a half-finished danger rating.No person needs that. That’s why I evaluated over 15 platforms to search out the greatest third-party danger administration (TPRM) software program for 2025: instruments that detect points early, automate assessments, and preserve vendor danger below management with out chasing paperwork.

And the information backs its use case. In keeping with the 2025 Venminder State of Third-Occasion Danger Administration Survey, 87% of organizations consider there’s worth in investing in TPRM actions. Moreover, 64% are already utilizing devoted platforms to do it. That type of consensus exhibits how vital these instruments have change into for danger, compliance, and procurement groups alike.

The six platforms that made this checklist stood out for his or her automation, versatile frameworks, and talent to help the whole lot from safety audits to procurement-led opinions. Whether or not you’re dealing with 20 distributors or 200, these instruments are constructed that will help you keep compliant with out slowing the enterprise down.

What makes third-party danger administration software program value it?

Danger doesn’t cease after onboarding. A vendor may cross the preliminary checks however fall out of compliance six months later, and if you happen to don’t catch it, your workforce is on the hook.

That’s what makes third-party danger administration software program definitely worth the funding. It’s not nearly organizing vendor knowledge; it’s about staying knowledgeable. The fitting platform helps you see modifications in vendor danger early, automate follow-ups, and keep away from surprises throughout audits or board opinions.

It additionally saves time. As a substitute of chasing standing updates throughout departments, TPRM software program offers you a shared system for assessments, scoring, and approvals. Meaning fewer delays, clearer accountability, and fewer room for issues to slide via the cracks.

What I prioritized when evaluating third-party vendor danger administration software program 

Not each platform that claims to handle vendor danger is constructed for the real-world stress that comes with it. I thought of the next components when evaluating the perfect third-party danger administration software program.

• Steady danger monitoring: It’s not sufficient to evaluate a vendor as soon as and transfer on. I regarded for TPRM platforms that provide ongoing visibility. Instruments that monitor modifications in a vendor’s safety posture, monetary well being, or compliance standing and set off alerts when one thing shifts had been excessive on my checklist.
• Automated assessments and follow-ups: Questionnaires are unavoidable, however they shouldn’t be a bottleneck. I prioritized platforms that allow you to automate preliminary assessments, ship reminders, and rating distributors based mostly on pre-set standards. This helps groups transfer quicker whereas nonetheless documenting the whole lot for audit readiness.
• Integration with compliance frameworks: Whether or not you are managing GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001, mapping vendor knowledge to compliance controls is essential. I regarded for instruments that provide native help for frequent frameworks or make it simple to construct your individual mapping system.
• Danger scoring and tiering flexibility: Not all distributors carry the identical danger, and your software program ought to mirror that. I gave desire to TPRM instruments that permit for configurable scoring fashions, tiering logic, and conditional workflows based mostly on vendor kind, geography, or service criticality.
• Collaboration and possession monitoring: Vendor danger isn’t owned by one workforce. I regarded for platforms that help cross-functional collaboration between procurement, safety, authorized, and compliance, with clear job possession and standing visibility inbuilt.
• Scalability and value: The most effective third-party danger administration platforms include clear interfaces, customizable dashboards, and versatile deployment fashions that may help small groups or scale with rising vendor ecosystems.

The checklist under comprises real person opinions from the Third-party & Provider Danger Administration Software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Embrace commonplace workflows and templates to evaluate and consider a variety of third-party dangers, together with monetary, authorized, strategic, reputational, moral, data safety, operational, cybersecurity, environmental, and geopolitical dangers
• Embrace commonplace experiences on third-party danger publicity
• Remediate third-party dangers in alignment with inside insurance policies
• Monitor ongoing vendor efficiency and any third-party danger modifications

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions could have been edited for readability.

UpGuard is a third-party danger administration platform that helps organizations monitor and consider vendor safety posture at scale. In keeping with G2 Information, it’s mostly utilized in monetary companies, IT companies, and software program, with nearly all of customers coming from mid-market (37%) and enterprise (55%) corporations.

One in all UpGuard’s mostly talked about advantages is the visibility it gives into vendor safety. Reviewers mentioned the platform helped them keep forward of vulnerabilities by highlighting expired certificates, DNS points, and different potential exposures throughout their provide chain. This made it simpler to evaluate which distributors posed probably the most danger and required fast consideration.

UpGuard’s automated danger scoring was one other standout. A number of customers appreciated that the instrument may rapidly consider and rank distributors based mostly on exterior danger indicators, making it simpler to prioritize their assessment course of. Groups managing a big quantity of distributors discovered this particularly useful throughout onboarding and periodic reassessments.

Buyer help additionally earned constant reward. Many G2 customers described the help workforce as responsive, educated, and straightforward to work with. A number of highlighted onboarding experiences the place UpGuard’s workforce helped information them via implementation and provided tailor-made recommendation for setup and greatest practices.

The interface itself was usually described as intuitive and straightforward to navigate. Reviewers famous that even workforce members with no technical background may rapidly perceive the right way to view vendor danger scores and drill into particular points. The readability of the dashboard was regularly highlighted as one of many platform’s high usability strengths.

That mentioned, just a few areas stood out as limitations for some groups. Whereas the built-in questionnaire instrument helped simplify elements of the evaluation course of, a number of reviewers discovered it restrictive when attempting to tailor inquiries to particular distributors or compliance necessities. The shortage of flexibility created additional work in circumstances the place customized inputs had been wanted, although groups working standardized assessments appeared much less affected.

Customization additionally got here up as a typical request. Some customers needed extra management over how danger scores had been calculated or how notifications had been configured for various danger occasions. The built-in scoring logic labored effectively for normal vendor opinions, however groups in extremely regulated industries or with distinctive danger fashions discovered themselves wishing for extra flexibility. Nonetheless, most agreed that the default setup supplied a strong basis for monitoring exterior danger throughout a rising vendor base.

UpGuard is a robust match for mid-market and enterprise groups that need exterior danger monitoring and clear visibility into third-party safety posture, with out sacrificing ease of use or help high quality.

What I dislike about UpGuard:

• Whereas the instrument was useful for standardized workflows, some G2 customers felt the questionnaire module didn’t supply sufficient flexibility when attempting to customise assessments for various vendor tiers.
• With customization, reviewers needed extra flexibility in configuring alerts, scoring logic, and workflows. That mentioned, most felt the out-of-the-box setup nonetheless gave them a strong basis to scale vendor danger packages successfully.

What G2 customers dislike about UpGuard:

“What we dislike at the moment with UpGuard is the limitation to have a number of relationship questionnaires. As a corporation that has a number of enterprise items, we considered another for now to proceed with the implementation.”

– UpGuard Assessment, Ghel E.

Vanta is extensively recognized for its governance, safety, and compliance (GRC) automation capabilities. Whereas it isn’t constructed solely for vendor danger administration, many G2 customers depend on it to deliver third-party visibility into their compliance packages. In keeping with G2 Information, Vanta is mostly utilized by small companies (50%) and mid-market corporations (48%), with adoption concentrated in software program, IT companies, and monetary companies.

Reviewers regularly highlighted Vanta’s automation capabilities. Duties like vendor discovery, proof assortment, doc evaluation, and danger scoring may all be dealt with with minimal handbook enter. Vanta AI performed a giant function right here, serving to groups save time by responding to safety questions and triggering follow-ups robotically.

The questionnaire builder additionally earned reward for rushing up assessments. Some groups used the built-in templates, whereas others most well-liked crafting their very own varieties. In both case, reviewers felt the instrument made it simpler to get the best solutions rapidly when evaluating distributors throughout completely different danger tiers.

Usability stood out as one other robust level. Many reviewers described the interface as clear and intuitive, permitting each technical and non-technical stakeholders to collaborate on duties like vendor opinions, compliance checks, and audit prep with no need fixed help.

Moreover, Vanta’s rising community of Belief Facilities helped customers confirm first-party knowledge immediately from their distributors, making it simpler to validate safety claims, minimize down on back-and-forth, and preserve a extra correct, up-to-date view of third-party danger.

Most reviewers felt Vanta provided strong worth out of the field, particularly for core compliance wants. That mentioned, pricing got here up as a sticking level for some. A number of customers famous that superior options, like enhanced vendor workflows or added automation, required higher-tier plans, which may stretch budgets for smaller groups. Even so, the truth that half of Vanta’s G2 reviewers come from small companies means that many groups nonetheless discover the platform accessible and definitely worth the funding.

Integrations drew some blended reactions. Whereas customers appreciated the variety of accessible connectors, just a few talked about that setup wasn’t at all times plug-and-play and typically wanted additional help. As soon as configured, although, most discovered the integrations reliable for syncing audit and vendor knowledge.

Regardless of these gaps, most agreed that Vanta provided a robust basis for scaling vendor compliance, significantly for corporations rising their GRC capabilities alongside third-party oversight.

What I dislike about Vanta:

• Whereas many customers discovered long-term worth in Vanta’s automation, some felt the pricing was a bit steep for smaller groups simply getting began.
• The vary of integrations was appreciated, however just a few reviewers mentioned the preliminary setup wasn’t as clean as they anticipated and infrequently wanted additional help.

What G2 customers dislike about Vanta:

“Whereas Vanta simplifies core compliance duties, we’d prefer to see deeper remediation steering, extra intuitive help for vendor danger monitoring, and expanded metrics for government reporting. Enhancing cross-framework mapping and providing higher controls for AI coverage governance would additionally enhance its long-term worth.”

– Vanta Assessment, Rajat R.

Descartes Denied Occasion Screening helps organizations display suppliers, companions, and different third events towards international watchlists to remain compliant with commerce rules. Based mostly on G2 Information, it’s most generally utilized in extremely regulated industries like aviation, aerospace, and protection, with 32% of reviewers from mid-market corporations and 52% from enterprise organizations.

Probably the most constant strengths reviewers talked about is the platform’s screening accuracy. Many customers mentioned Descartes made it simpler to vet suppliers towards denied celebration lists and international sanctions databases, serving to them decrease danger throughout onboarding or ongoing due diligence.

This accuracy was additional amplified by automation. As a substitute of manually monitoring entries throughout a number of lists, customers described how Descartes runs steady background checks that flag potential dangers with out disrupting workflows. For groups managing giant vendor volumes, this automated screening helped scale back errors whereas saving vital time.

Actual-time alerts had been one other recurring spotlight. A number of customers famous how rapidly the system flagged dangers, giving compliance and commerce groups sufficient time to reply earlier than a transaction progressed. And with built-in ERP and commerce system integrations, Descartes was in a position to ship these alerts as a part of customers’ present workflows.

Assist additionally earned reward. Many famous that the workforce was fast to help with configuration questions and helped customers confidently navigate the extra advanced features of denied celebration screening.

Having mentioned that, just a few reviewers identified that false positives had been a recurring problem. In some circumstances, overly delicate matching logic triggered pointless investigations, particularly when working with international entities that had comparable names. Nonetheless, customers appreciated that match rule thresholds might be fine-tuned with assist from help to scale back these occurrences.

A number of others talked about that the interface felt dated and might be extra intuitive for first-time customers, although they acknowledged that when the system was configured, it ran easily with minimal intervention.

Descartes Denied Occasion Screening is a robust match for compliance and danger groups in regulated industries who want dependable watchlist protection, responsive help, and automatic screening workflows to attenuate third-party publicity.

What I dislike about Descartes Denied Occasion Screening:

• Some G2 reviewers famous that the instrument sometimes returned false positives, which added just a few additional steps to their assessment course of.
• Others talked about that whereas the interface acquired the job executed, it felt barely dated in comparison with newer platforms.

What G2 customers dislike about Descartes Denied Occasion Screening:

“The benefit of use is the place it nonetheless lags. The interface feels outdated, and it’s not at all times clear the place to go for sure capabilities until you’re utilizing it every day. Since our workforce makes use of it just a few instances per week somewhat than every day, we regularly discover ourselves re-learning steps or referring again to inside notes. Whereas implementation help was first rate, the onboarding documentation may’ve been clearer. Buyer help is usually useful and responsive, although it typically takes a follow-up to get an in depth reply.”

– Descartes Denied Occasion Screening Assessment, Shane D.

Secureframe is greatest recognized for serving to groups keep audit-ready, however G2 customers additionally depend on it to handle vendor danger extra confidently. In keeping with G2 Information, Secureframe is primarily adopted by small companies (65%) and mid-market corporations (31%), mostly in laptop science, IT companies, and monetary companies.

From what I gathered in opinions, one in all Secureframe’s most appreciated options is its centralized vendor dashboard. Customers talked about with the ability to entry the whole lot from vendor profiles and evaluation outcomes to connected paperwork and historical past logs in a single tab. For groups managing a number of distributors, this visibility appeared to make a giant distinction.

I additionally noticed lots of reward for the platform’s steady monitoring capabilities. A number of customers highlighted how Secureframe helps flag unapproved companies accessed through SSO, catching shadow IT distributors earlier than they slip via the cracks. Many additionally talked about establishing recurring vendor opinions, tiered by danger stage, with duties and notifications routed via instruments like Slack and Jira. That automation felt significantly useful for fast-moving groups attempting to maintain up with coverage checks.

One other characteristic that stood out was Comply AI, which helps extract related responses immediately from vendor paperwork like SOC 2 experiences or safety insurance policies. The platform then pre-fills safety questionnaires with urged solutions, giving groups a head begin on vendor evaluations whereas saving hours on handbook opinions.

Ease of use got here up regularly as effectively. Reviewers throughout technical and non-technical roles mentioned Secureframe made it simple to navigate audits, assessments, and vendor workflows with no need in depth onboarding. I additionally noticed a number of mentions of a useful and responsive help workforce, which added to the general ease of adoption.

That mentioned, just a few G2 customers famous restricted flexibility in vendor administration workflows, significantly when attempting to tailor processes for various provider tiers. Others wished the questionnaire module provided extra customization choices, like dynamic scoring or conditional logic, to raised match advanced danger necessities. Nonetheless, most reviewers felt Secureframe provided a strong basis for vendor danger monitoring, particularly for groups earlier of their third-party governance journey.

For those who’re searching for an accessible but succesful TPRM resolution that mixes automation, AI help, and ongoing monitoring, Secureframe is value contemplating.

What I dislike about Secureframe:

• Some G2 reviewers felt the questionnaire module was a bit of inflexible, particularly when customizing assessments for various vendor sorts.
• A number of G2 opinions additionally talked about restricted flexibility in how vendor workflows had been structured and managed.

What G2 customers dislike about Secureframe:

“Though the platform addresses nearly all of our necessities, the sheer variety of options generally is a bit daunting initially. It could be useful if there have been a better solution to prioritize or conceal options that are not wanted, as this might make it simpler for brand new customers to stand up to hurry extra rapidly.”

– Secureframe Assessment, Bryan R.

IBM OpenPages is an enterprise-grade GRC platform that features sturdy help for third-party danger administration. In keeping with G2 Information, it’s mostly adopted in industries like laptop software program, IT companies, and monetary companies, with most customers coming from small (37%) and mid-sized companies (43%).

A number of reviewers appreciated how configurable the platform was relating to vendor danger processes. I learn in opinions that groups had been in a position to adapt workflows to match their very own inside insurance policies, regulatory wants, and most well-liked scoring methodologies. This flexibility prolonged into how customers tracked danger severity, mitigation plans, and associated points throughout vendor relationships, permitting for extra detailed danger modeling with out forcing a one-size-fits-all construction.

OpenPages helps groups handle your entire vendor questionnaire course of in a single place, from creating assessments to sending reminders and reviewing responses. A number of customers mentioned this diminished the handbook back-and-forth and made it simpler to remain constant throughout distributors. The power to attain responses additionally supplied groups with a clearer solution to consider third-party danger and determine who to work with.

One other key theme I observed was how helpful the reporting and dashboard options had been for large-scale visibility. Some customers mentioned they might group distributors by geography, tier, or enterprise unit, which made it simpler to identify patterns or examine particular points. This was useful for corporations dealing with many third events, the place having a centralized view of vendor hierarchies and danger metrics made oversight less complicated.

By way of technical functionality, OpenPages was additionally famous for its integrations. It could join with each enterprise and exterior programs to drag in vendor knowledge, serving to consolidate third-party data right into a unified repository. That consolidation gave customers a clearer image of their whole vendor panorama and improved effectivity in areas like onboarding and efficiency monitoring.

The educational curve did come up as a tradeoff in a number of opinions. Whereas G2 customers valued the platform’s depth, they famous that it required some ramp-up time, particularly for these with out prior expertise in danger or compliance programs. Regardless of that, most agreed the trouble was worthwhile as soon as groups grew to become aware of the system.

Pricing was one other space the place opinions assorted barely. A number of reviewers discovered the price to be comparatively excessive for smaller groups. Even so, it appears many corporations continued to depend on OpenPages for its long-term scalability and the extent of management it presents for vendor danger administration.

For those who’re trying to construct a mature, centralized program for monitoring vendor danger, IBM OpenPages presents a excessive diploma of customization, robust technical integrations, and help for advanced third-party governance.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:

• Some opinions famous that getting in control may take time, primarily for groups new to GRC platforms. That mentioned, most agreed the flexibleness and depth made the training worthwhile as soon as they acquired going.
• A number of customers famous that the pricing felt a bit of excessive in comparison with how usually they used the platform. Nonetheless, many felt the worth aligned effectively with the capabilities provided.

What G2 customers dislike about IBM OpenPages:

“The fee is excessive as in comparison with different GRC instruments, and there are some hurdles in person adoption.”

– IBM OpenPages Assessment, Vishal D. 

D&B Danger Analytics permits groups to judge provider danger and make extra knowledgeable selections utilizing a mixture of proprietary knowledge and built-in workflows. In keeping with G2 Information, the platform is used most frequently by professionals in IT companies, accounting, and insurance coverage, spanning small companies (25%) to enterprise groups (36%), with the biggest phase coming from mid-market corporations (38%).

What stood out to me within the opinions was how a lot customers valued the entry to deep provider intelligence. Many mentioned the platform gave them the type of monetary and operational perception they couldn’t simply discover elsewhere: AI-driven proprietary danger scores, UNSPSC, parent-child data, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

Talking of the platform’s potential to establish provider dangers and AI-generated danger scores, the instrument additionally presents SER, SSI, and PAYDEX as key sources for detecting pink flags and rating distributors by publicity ranges. This kind of intelligence is especially useful for groups managing giant provider networks.

One other usually praised characteristic is the platform’s automated screening workflows. As a substitute of counting on handbook processes, customers described a guided, five-step process that helps establish high-risk suppliers by checking sanctions lists, adversarial media, and extra. A number of reviewers additionally highlighted enhanced screening choices like Final Helpful Possession (UBO) knowledge, which gives an extra layer of element when vetting advanced provider relationships.

G2 customers additionally talked about how simple it was to get began with the platform. I got here throughout a number of mentions of quick implementation and minimal technical carry. It appeared like customers had been in a position to arrange monitoring, configure dashboards, and begin monitoring danger with little or no hand-holding. One thing I think about is a large plus for stretched procurement or danger groups.

I additionally noticed belief within the knowledge. Many reviewers mentioned the depth and accuracy of D&B’s international database made them really feel extra ready throughout provider opinions and audits. Some talked about that having alerts and monitoring tied to real-time knowledge helped them catch points, like credit score dips or authorized pink flags, earlier than they grew to become actual issues.

That mentioned, some G2 customers identified challenges with knowledge protection in sure areas, significantly in rising markets. I learn that provider profiles for personal or newer companies had been usually sparse or lacking altogether. In some circumstances, customers reported false positives or duplicate entries that made it tougher to belief the automated flags. These limitations didn’t outweigh the advantages for many groups, however they did spotlight the significance of cross-checking insights earlier than taking motion.

Some reviewers additionally mentioned that pricing felt a bit excessive, significantly for smaller groups. Even so, the platform nonetheless appears to strike a superb stability, with customers throughout completely different firm sizes discovering worth in its capabilities.

D&B Danger Analytics is a robust possibility for corporations that need dependable provider knowledge, quick implementation, and a platform that scales with danger and procurement wants.

What I dislike about D&B Danger Analytics:

• Some customers famous that provider knowledge was extra restricted in sure areas, primarily for rising markets, however nonetheless discovered the platform dependable for almost all of their vendor base.
• A number of reviewers talked about that the pricing might be a stretch for smaller groups or occasional use circumstances, although many nonetheless felt the platform delivered robust worth total.

What G2 customers dislike about D&B Danger Analytics:

“Whereas I haven’t got private opinions, some customers might need considerations with D&B Danger Analytics, comparable to excessive prices, a steep studying curve as a result of its complexity, potential over-reliance on knowledge, restricted protection in sure industries or areas, and challenges with integration into present programs.”

– D&B Danger Analytics Assessment, Abhishek Kumar Y.

For those who’re pondering past vendor danger, right here’s our information to the greatest GRC instruments to finish the image.