Ethereum’s ongoing underperformance towards Bitcoin has reignited debate over what’s holding the asset up, and who’s actually behind its demand.
In line with Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow, roughly $6 billion in South Korean retail cash is now propping up so-called Ethereum treasuries, firms accumulating ETH as a balance-sheet asset echoing MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin technique. Mow issued the declare in an Oct. 5 put up on X, arguing that “ETH influencers” have been flying to Seoul to court docket retail merchants chasing the subsequent “technique play.”
In line with CoinMarketCap, as of Oct. 6, ETH has slipped about 1.9% up to now 24 hours and is down roughly 5% towards Bitcoin over the previous month. That weak point, Mow urged, exposes how short-term retail enthusiasm, slightly than institutional conviction, is sustaining Ethereum’s valuation.
Knowledge from the Strategic ETH Reserve reveals that 67 entities, together with BitMine and SharpLink, collectively maintain about 5.49 million ETH (roughly $25 billion), or 4.5% of the overall provide.
Mow attributed a lot of this publicity to South Korean retail buyers recognized regionally as seohak gaemie, claiming they’ve funneled round $6 billion into Ethereum treasury firms. He argued that promoters have been advertising these corporations because the “subsequent MicroStrategy,” luring merchants in search of simple analogs to Bitcoin’s company accumulation playbook:
“Many of those buyers have zero concept in regards to the ETH/BTC chart and assume they’re shopping for the subsequent technique commerce.”
He warned that enthusiasm constructed on “monetary illiteracy” might backfire, particularly as Ethereum continues to lag behind Bitcoin in relative efficiency.
Ethereum’s worth efficiency displays the priority. Regardless of periodic inflows and renewed narrative pushes, ETH has remained capped beneath its earlier all-time excessive of $4,946 and continues to weaken towards Bitcoin. The ETH/BTC ratio has fallen by over 5% up to now yr, reinforcing the notion that a lot of the help for Ethereum’s market cap is narrative-driven slightly than based mostly on elementary progress or institutional adoption.
Mow’s critique aligns with feedback from Mechanism Capital co-founder Andrew Kang, who has additionally solid doubt on the monetary logic behind Ethereum-based treasuries. Kang pointed to tasks like Tom Lee’s BitMine as examples of “undisciplined treasury fashions” that lack the monetary construction seen in profitable Bitcoin-holding corporations. “The technicals for Ethereum are bearish,” Kang mentioned, including that ETH’s long-term vary might stay between $1,000 and $4,800 with no main change in fundamentals.
Kang concluded that Ethereum’s valuation “comes primarily from monetary illiteracy,” evaluating its speculative momentum to XRP’s historic rallies. He argued that whereas retail hype can maintain a big market cap for a while, it’s not a sturdy base: “The valuation that may be derived from monetary illiteracy will not be infinite.”
Whether or not Korean retail demand turns into a brand new structural pillar for Ethereum, or the final gasp of a fading narrative, might rely on how lengthy the “ETH treasury” story can outrun the chart.
