Saturday, September 13, 2025
HomeEthereumBrian Quintenz v. Tyler Winklevoss

Brian Quintenz v. Tyler Winklevoss



CFTC Chair nominee Brian Quintenz posted a number of messages he’d exchanged with Tyler Winklevoss, seemingly in a bid to get his nomination course of again on observe.

You’re studying State of Crypto, a CoinDesk e-newsletter wanting on the intersection of cryptocurrency and authorities. Click on right here to join future editions.

The narrative

On Wednesday, at CoinDesk’s Coverage and Regulation occasion, one main subject of dialog was a put up from former Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee Commissioner Brian Quintenz through which he shared chat logs from a dialog with Gemini co-founder and CEO Tyler Winklevoss, an surprising transfer from a former public official ready for the Senate to verify him to move up the commodities regulator.

Why it issues

Quintenz’s path to changing into chair of the CFTC appeared clear till late July, when the Senate Agriculture Committee twice postponed a key vote to advance his nomination. The White Home requested the committee to pause the vote with out initially offering a proof, although later Winklevoss instructed CoinDesk he had lobbied the White Home to impose that maintain. The CFTC is ready to develop into the first spot market regulator for crypto within the U.S., and is at the moment helmed by Appearing Chair Caroline Pham, who intends to depart the company after Quintenz’s nomination and no different commissioners. The potential lack of management because the company will get tasked with new mandates may decelerate or in any other case complicate any rulemakings it engages in.

Breaking it down

An lively nominee awaiting a Senate vote sharing an trade he had with donors to the president is uncommon, to say the least. In his put up, Quintenz mentioned he had “by no means been inclined to launch non-public messages” however that he believed President Donald Trump “might need been misled.”

“I’ve posted right here the messages that embrace the questions Tyler Winklevoss requested me pertaining to their prior litigation with the CFTC,” he mentioned. “I imagine these texts make it clear what they had been after from me, and what I refused to vow. It is my understanding that after this trade they contacted the president and requested that my affirmation be paused for causes aside from what’s mirrored in these texts.”

The texts he shared confirmed he had exchanged messages with Winklevoss on July 24 and 25. The primary postponed vote within the Senate Agriculture Committee was initially scheduled for July 21, and the rescheduled vote was on July 28. The White Home requested no less than the second vote be delayed.

Spokespeople for Gemini and the Senate Agriculture Committee didn’t return requests for remark, and a White Home press official couldn’t be reached. Quintenz declined to remark past his put up when reached earlier this week by CoinDesk.

The messages had been about Gemini’s criticism with the CFTC’s Inspector Basic tied to a CFTC case towards the trade, which was settled earlier this yr. Winklevoss requested Quintenz for his ideas on the criticism, whereas Quintenz repeatedly mentioned it might be higher for “a completely confirmed chair” to weigh in on the matter.

It is unclear from the messages whether or not Winklevoss was asking for a quid professional quo (he talked about that Quintenz had requested for an endorsement) or was simply making an attempt to verify to his personal satisfaction that Quintenz would finish what Winklevoss described as “lawfare” towards Gemini and in any other case reshape the company to be extra industry-friendly.

On Quintenz’s finish, his reticence was possible political savvines — if he had made some type of dedication, he could have needed to recuse himself from participating with the problem when he truly will get to the company. If he made a dedication and it turned public previous to a Senate vote, it might additionally most likely develop into a speaking level if there’s a debate on his nomination. Quintenz additionally mentioned within the messages that he didn’t have “something near a full image of what’s going on contained in the constructing,” and that he “determined to attend till I can get into the position to get that view versus making an attempt to get it now via present management.”

The timing of Quintenz’s affirmation votes — he wants each the Senate Agriculture Committee to advance him and your entire Senate to verify him — stay in query. However it’s an indication of how a lot that course of has slowed that he felt posting these messages would assist his trigger.

Monday

  • There are not any hearings or votes scheduled for this upcoming week.

Should you’ve bought ideas or questions on what I ought to talk about subsequent week or every other suggestions you’d wish to share, be at liberty to e mail me at nik@coindesk.com or discover me on Bluesky @nikhileshde.bsky.social.

You may also be a part of the group dialog on Telegram.

See ya’ll subsequent week!



RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments