Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT crew frozen in shock.

Had the menace been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct menace detection and mitigation framework might need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from the greatest menace intelligence instruments right now.

With their insights, I observed the demand for multi-source information aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time menace detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven information privateness, and contextual menace intelligence, that are key options in menace intelligence instruments that may stop disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to research and consider 7 greatest menace intelligence instruments available in the market right now to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and scale back the dependency on handbook groups to extract menace histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest menace intelligence instruments: my high picks

A menace intelligence device protects and safeguards a corporation towards various safety dangers, similar to cyber assaults, brute drive assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Once I began evaluating menace intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the newest safety protocols to keep up sturdy encryption requirements for a corporation’s information and supply real-time menace detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety crew searches for, similar to the necessity to gather and correlate menace information from various sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), business feeds, and inside logs. Consumers additionally search instruments that supply AI-based automation for menace evaluation and contextual menace intelligence to detect ways, methods, and procedures concerning threats. Whereas menace intelligence instruments establish vulnerabilities, ERM options guarantee these insights feed into company-wide resilience.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 menace intelligence instruments available in the market, which provide strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a menace intelligence device price it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a device that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or information breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect menace intelligence device.

In keeping with Markets and Markets, the menace intelligence market was estimated at USD 11.55 billion in 2025 and is projected to succeed in USD 22.97 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 14.7% through the forecast interval. 

Additional, these techniques combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments, and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and establish and mitigate threats sooner.

With a robust deal with safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that you must look out for in a menace intelligence device. 

• Automated menace information aggregation and normalization: Once I assess any menace intelligence device, the very first thing I guarantee is that it could possibly create and correlate menace information from a number of sources like OSINT, inside logs, and business feeds. This was an important step in contextualizing threats and standardizing menace patterns for quicker evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, menace information stays chaotic and nearly unusable. An excellent device unifies this data and saves analysts numerous handbook hours of labor.
• Contextualized menace enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A powerful menace enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the menace. The platform should layer crucial metadata, similar to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you simply aren’t simply seeing what the menace is but additionally why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that depart customers flying blind.
• Actual-time menace detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a menace intelligence device must be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not by way of integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to combat AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time menace detection, you may transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. Alongside menace feeds and enrichment, many organizations depend on high MDR companies to actively monitor, detect, and reply to evolving assaults. 
• Tailor-made intelligence in your trade and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they allow you to customise menace feeds and intelligence based mostly in your trade, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the crew will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Risk investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be geared up with a complicated analytics dashboard to show menace circumstances, menace sources, and menace mitigation information. They even have investigation workbenches the place you may pivot between menace indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive looking. 
• Collaboration, sharing, and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no crew operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inside or exterior groups, organizations, and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to type a sturdy safety infrastructure. Equally necessary is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and influence to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils right down to how a menace intelligence device creates menace information, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of sensible AI-based breaches to set off menace alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out when it comes to buyer satisfaction, buyer phase, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest menace intelligence device contenders on this checklist since they’re based mostly on real-time G2 consumer evaluation information.

Out of 30+ greatest menace intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this checklist. The checklist beneath comprises real critiques from the menace intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present data on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for frequent and rising threats.
• Analyze world threats on several types of networks and gadgets 
• Cater menace data to particular IT options.

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and software safety platform that retains your safety techniques updated and defends your on-prem or cloud information towards unwarranted assaults or breaches.

As a class chief on G2 based mostly on 127 verified critiques, Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an general buyer satisfaction rating of 72, and 90% of customers are prone to advocate it to others. 

What instantly impressed me was how simple it was to combine with my current Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was principally clean; no extra configuration is required until you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure companies, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. In addition they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile if you’re not prepared for an enormous dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card in your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous assets. I beloved how detailed it was, breaking down particular person assets inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Typically, if you’re fortunate, you may even simply click on “Repair” and it auto-remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the combination with Azure Lively Listing made identification safety tremendous clean.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier provides you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Truthfully, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues received somewhat extra highly effective. I received entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive software controls, and community menace detection. The just-in-time entry characteristic is a lifesaver if you happen to work with VMs and want to scale back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other characteristic often called Defender for Servers, a premium plan that shocked me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file modifications, however generally misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It could be even higher if they may proactively flag behaviours as an alternative of simply logging modifications.

I additionally wish to point out their assist for menace safety, real-time detection, AI-based menace analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring electronic mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to defend trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, Microsoft Defender for Cloud is acknowledged for sturdy multi-cloud safety, although complexity is a recurring theme. Organising superior options or third-party integrations can take time, and a few customers point out occasional false positives that add noise to alerts.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and usefulness. Superior protections are sometimes tied to higher-tier plans, which can really feel steep for smaller companies. The interface additionally evolves shortly, and whereas highly effective, frequent modifications could make navigation much less intuitive.

Total, G2 sentiment displays Microsoft Defender for Cloud as a dependable and strong resolution for safeguarding information and monitoring safety postures throughout hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the device offers endpoint safety for all gadgets, the deployment course of may be very complicated when configuring safety for iOS gadgets. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It could possibly shortly develop into costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the complicated pricing, which might shortly develop into costly, and the overload of alerts, typically resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud assist is not as strong for non-azure platforms; the preliminary setups may be difficult for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Overview, Archi P.

Recorded Future offers a whole breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates menace mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall towards snoops or spies.

As a class chief in menace intelligence software program, Recorded Future has achieved an eloquent buyer satisfaction rating of 97, based mostly on 109 critiques. Round 92% of customers will advocate Recorded Future for intelligence studies, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it felt—like having an analyst crew operating 24/7, continually feeding me actionable menace insights. It isn’t simply information dumped from random sources. Recorded Future curates menace intelligence from a formidable mixture of open net, darkish net, closed boards, and technical telemetry, and someway, all of it is sensible.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they aren’t solely real-time but additionally prioritized based mostly on relevance and influence.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mix actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler, too, as all the things plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally admire the myriad of options, like their super-detailed menace maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. In case you are in an enormous group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions supply much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand companies, which is nice once I want professional validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, Recorded Future is revered for its breadth of menace intelligence, although the interface can really feel overwhelming at first. With a lot information flowing in, customers be aware the significance of tuning alerts and filters to keep away from being overloaded.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and have entry. The transfer to a modular mannequin offers flexibility, however superior capabilities like fraud detection or nation-state monitoring are sometimes tied to premium tiers, which might really feel restrictive for smaller safety groups.

Total, G2 sentiment displays Recorded Future as a proactive and intelligence-rich platform that empowers safety groups to detect, analyze, and mitigate threats in actual time.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future affords a whole package deal, it comes with a price. I observed that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, it’s essential pay for every further API integration, so the licensing mannequin is expensive.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand new customers to make the most of and work with it with out in depth coaching. The educational curve is steep, notably for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many alternative modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my crew does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Overview, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that enables corporations to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely influence the general privateness community.

Based mostly on 102 verified G2 critiques, Cyberint has achieved a satisfaction rating of 97, making it a class chief. Additionally, round 93% of customers within the general enterprise phase, consisting of small, mid, and enterprise corporations, are prone to advocate Cyberint to others.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Risk Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is precisely what’s necessary when integrating it along with your safety operations.

The device’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time menace detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our crew establish and reply to darkish net threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert is tagged with the respective menace sort—be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered property, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw information at you; it contextualizes it. We notably benefited from their darkish net intelligence and deep visibility into menace actors’ ways, methods, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 menace hunter embedded in our crew.

A characteristic I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This type of foresight has saved us a number of instances from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively displays social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Truthfully, it’s some of the full suites I’ve seen in a menace intelligence platform.

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, Cyberint earns reward for its menace intelligence protection, although some customers discover the API much less mature than anticipated. Integrating into broader SOAR pipelines can really feel restricted, and customization of dashboards and studies doesn’t at all times present the flexibleness groups need.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round workflow friction and have depth. Copying or sharing visible information like menace graphs isn’t seamless, and some reviewers point out occasional false positives the place filtering and suggestions might be smoother. Some superior capabilities additionally seem tied to higher-tier plans, which isn’t at all times clearly communicated.

Total, G2 sentiment displays Cyberint as a complete digital threat safety resolution that helps organizations monitor, detect, and defend towards exterior threats with sturdy protection and premium-tier assist.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint offers end-to-end alerts about lively assaults, it’s essential manually replace the standing of alerts, even you probably have completed so by way of a SIEM system.
• I additionally observed some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

The answer has options that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance remains to be useful to a corporation.

One other factor is that the extra options is usually a bit regarding when it comes to the group’s funds. However, if such a burden may be dealt with, I absolutely assist having this resolution if you’re in search of a cyber menace intelligence resolution

– Cyberint Overview, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Falcon offers anti-ransomware options to keep up safety benchmarks throughout all of your community gadgets and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection underneath its belt.

Based mostly on 130+ verified critiques on G2, CrowdStrike Falcon has achieved a buyer satisfaction score of 76, with over 94% customers keen to advocate it to others for malware detection, safety validation, and endpoint intelligence.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t bathroom down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly simple, too. I used to be in a position to deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t should juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Considered one of its superpowers is real-time menace detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based menace intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Stop module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it offers is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally admire is the single-agent method. I didn’t should overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration via Falcon Highlight, menace looking by way of Falcon OverWatch, or system management, all the things built-in seamlessly.

When you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed menace looking, which, let’s be trustworthy, is a game-changer when your crew is small or overworked. These guys virtually develop into your SOC extension.

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its sturdy detection and endpoint safety, although pricing is usually talked about as a barrier. Smaller companies, specifically, be aware that the modular pricing construction can really feel costly as wants develop.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to assist and usefulness. Whereas many interactions with assist are optimistic, ticket resolutions can sometimes take longer than anticipated. A number of reviewers additionally point out false positives and be aware that the Falcon console, whereas highly effective, comes with a studying curve for brand new customers.

Total, G2 sentiment displays CrowdStrike Falcon as a market-leading endpoint safety resolution that delivers broad protection and superior detection capabilities.

What I dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an awesome job of offering alerts and updates, we can’t go into a lot element once we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally observed that there are a lot of screens to handle, it’s laborious to succeed in each characteristic, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“I am not glad with the pricing in comparison with another alternate options, that are somewhat bit greater, and it has restricted cell assist.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Overview, Bhavanasi N.

Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety offers AI-powered information safety towards email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Based mostly on 120 verified critiques on G2, Mimecast has achieved a median buyer satisfaction rating of 70, with 90% customers keen to advocate it to others for electronic mail safety, electronic mail safety, and safe electronic mail gateway. 

Mimecast is a device that runs quietly within the background, shielding organizations from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It hardly ever lets something malicious slip via.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely refined impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly underneath the radar.

Considered one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an electronic mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it cross via. It actively scans all the things embedded within the message. The e-mail continuity characteristic additionally proves useful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains electronic mail site visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a strong management heart.

You may configure insurance policies right down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and menace studies. I particularly admire the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, Mimecast is revered for its sturdy electronic mail safety, although false positives are generally talked about as a disadvantage. A number of customers be aware that legit messages may be flagged as suspicious, and the method of manually whitelisting them isn’t at all times as clean because it might be.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to coverage configuration. Organising superior insurance policies can take trial and error, and a few reviewers point out intermittent login points throughout administration.

Total, G2 sentiment displays Mimecast as a scalable and dependable electronic mail safety resolution that delivers sturdy safety and encryption for organizations dealing with massive volumes of crucial communications.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook evaluation.
• One other factor I observed is that Mimecast generally flags legit emails as suspicious, resulting in communication delays.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety:

The draw back is that the assist is somewhat off-putting if you’re previous your implementation part. A few of the guidelines and insurance policies are laborious to configure via implementation.

– Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety Overview, Jessica C.

ThreatLocker is a superb device for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It offers a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your information and content material safety workflows and scale back the chance of information breaches or vulnerabilities.

Based mostly on 86 verified critiques, ThreatLocker has a good buyer satisfaction common of 91, making it a pacesetter within the class. Additional, a whopping 97% customers will advocate it to others for intelligence studies, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however ThreatLocker stands out, principally as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a primary antivirus or general-purpose device. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the software degree.

The core characteristic, software whitelisting, implies that solely software program we’ve explicitly accredited can run. It provides us rapid visibility into unauthorized applications and, in lots of circumstances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other characteristic I take advantage of closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but additionally about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted software like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate information directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us stop lateral motion and prohibit how even accredited instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s assist crew has been some of the dependable facets of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration concern or wanted steering, they have been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of assist made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days once we have been nonetheless determining methods to construction insurance policies successfully.

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, ThreatLocker is praised for its granular management, although the training curve may be vital. Organising insurance policies requires time and a focus, as customers have to stability blocking threats with out limiting legit exercise.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is the quick tempo of updates. Whereas frequent enhancements present the product is evolving, documentation can lag behind, leaving groups to regulate and relearn options extra typically than anticipated.

Total, G2 sentiment displays ThreatLocker as a strong safety platform that delivers sturdy coverage enforcement, privilege administration, and compliance-focused auditing.

What I dislike about ThreatLocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero-trust method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals is usually a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety device, the general studying curve will likely be steep for customers who will not be accustomed to its interface and sophisticated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about ThreatLocker:

“It isn’t a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & assets to completely perceive the product and supply wonderful assist to your clients. It isn’t a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend possibly 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– ThreatLocker Overview, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered menace intelligence device that detects cyber threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and displays any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance information protection mechanisms.

Based mostly on 50+ verified G2, CloudSEK achieved a median satisfaction rating of 88, with 97% customers keen to advocate it to others for proactive alerts, deployment, and safety validation. 

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it simple to get a complete snapshot of your menace panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every thing from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is offered in a manner that simply is sensible. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me a whole image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform would not simply warn you about current threats; it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you end up attempting to stay one step forward of adversaries.

As an illustration, their menace actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but additionally the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure characteristic for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you end up coping with recurring or false-positive-prone alerts. 

In keeping with G2 consumer critiques, CloudSEK is valued for its fast deployment and robust threat monitoring, although false positives are sometimes famous. The detection engine is usually a bit aggressive, requiring upfront fine-tuning of alert guidelines to keep away from pointless escalations.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to customization and automation. Creating new guidelines or workflows can really feel extra inflexible in comparison with different platforms, and whereas API integrations exist, documentation isn’t at all times as strong as customers count on.

Total, G2 sentiment displays CloudSEK as an accessible and scalable platform that delivers complete digital threat monitoring and model safety throughout net, deep net, and darkish net sources.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK affords real-time menace alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule isn’t tuned correctly.
• I additionally observed the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re continually drowning in information that principally seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK may streamline its setup course of and supply extra aggressive pricing, I’d be far more inclined to advocate it.”

– CloudSEK Overview, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your information safety workflow hub in a single place with the very best SIEM software program and select a extra centralized manner of monitoring your information remotely.